Background and Objectives Evaluating the efficacy of the fractional CO2 laser, promestriene, and vaginal lubricant to treat urinary symptoms in women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Study Design/Materials and Methods We conducted a randomized clinical trial with 72 postmenopausal women aged 50 years or older. The participants were randomized to one intervention each in three treatment groups fractional CO2 laser, promestriene, and vaginal lubricant. Urinary symptoms were assessed prior to treatment and 2 weeks after treatment completion using validated questionnaires, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ‐UI SF), and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder (ICIQ‐OAB). Results There was a significant reduction in the total ICIQ‐UI SF score in the intragroup comparison (baseline vs. week 14) of the CO2 laser group (P = 0.004). This group also showed a statistically significant reduction in nocturia (1.33 ± 0.87 vs. 1.00 ± 0.76, respectively; P = 0.031). In the intergroup comparison after treatment, nocturia in the lubricant group had worsened compared with that of the other two groups (P = 0.002). Regarding the total ICIQ‐OAB score, the results of the CO2 laser group were superior to those of the lubricant group in the intergroup comparison (7.76 ± 3.36, P = 0.020; analysis of variance P = 0.038). Conclusion The results were significantly different between the intravaginal fractional CO2 laser and topical estrogen groups for treating urinary symptoms related to the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Further controlled and randomized studies are needed. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of fractional CO2 laser therapy, promestriene, and vaginal lubricants on genitourinary syndrome treatment and sexual function in postmenopausal women. Methods: We performed a randomized clinical trial including 72 postmenopausal women over the age of 50 years. The women were randomized into three intervention groups to receive one of the following treatments: three sessions of intravaginal fractional CO2 laser therapy; 10 mg of intravaginal promestriene cream 3 times a week; and vaginal lubricant application alone. Vaginal maturation, Vaginal Health Index (VHI) score, and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were evaluated at baseline and after 14 weeks of therapy. Results: We observed an improvement in the vaginal elasticity, volume, moisture, and pH in the CO2 laser and promestriene groups. The VHI score at 14 weeks was higher in the CO2 laser group (mean score 18.68) than in the promestriene (15.11) and lubricant (10.44) groups (P < 0.001). Regarding vaginal maturation, basal cells were reduced and superficial cells were increased after treatment. This improvement was more significant in the CO2 laser group (P <0.001). The FSFI score only showed improvement in the desire and lubrication domains in the CO2 laser group. There were no differences in total FSFI score among the three treatment groups. There were no adverse effects associated with any of the treatments. Conclusions: The use of fractional CO2 laser therapy to treat genitourinary syndrome resulted in better short-term effects than those of promestriene or lubricant with respect to improving the vaginal health in postmenopausal women.

The results improve our understanding of the factors associated with disability in Brazilian women and may help identify those who need multidisciplinary support to reduce effects on quality of life.

The correlation found for the FRAX-Brazil score obtained with and without the inclusion of BMD values was good for the risk of a major osteoporosis fracture and moderate for the risk of a hip fracture. The fracture risk calculated was similar in this population irrespective of whether or not BMD values were included in the algorithm.