Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are associated with the severity of various diseases. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the relationship of NLR and MLR with the severity of myocarditis. 202 consecutive patients with myocarditis were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Laboratory parameters and clinical data were extracted from hospital records and discharge letters. Median NLR was 2.48 (IQR 1.55–4.58) and median MLR was 0.42 (IQR 0.39–0.58). NLR and MLR correlated with HF, CRP and leukocyte count, MLR further correlated inversely with LV systolic function (rs = − 0.379, p = 0.030). Both ratios correlated better with length of hospital stay (NLR: rs = 0.435, p = 0.003; MLR: rs = 0.534, p < 0.0001) than CRP, leukocyte count, IL-6 or procalcitonin. AUCs for the prediction of prolonged hospital stay (NLR = 0.75, MLR = 0.80), and optimal cut-offs therefor were calculated. Patients who had in-hospital complications showed a higher NLR, however, this remained statistically insignificant. NLR and MLR correlated with the length of stay, as well as with several clinical and laboratory parameters in patients with myocarditis. Since white blood cell differentials are relatively easy and fast to perform, both ratios could facilitate further risk stratification in affected patients.
Background: Previous animal studies reported an association of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with adverse outcomes in acute myocarditis, which is why these drugs are currently not recommended in affected patients. In this retrospective case-control study, we sought to investigate the effects of NSAID treatment in patients with acute myocarditis and myopericarditis to complement the available evidence. Method: A total of 114 patients with acute myocarditis were retrospectively enrolled. Demographical, clinical and laboratory data were extracted from hospital records. Patients who received NSAIDs (n = 39, 34.2%) were compared to controls. Follow-up on all-cause mortality was acquired for two years. Propensity score matching was additionally conducted to account for covariate imbalances between groups. Results: Treatment with NSAIDs was neither associated with a worse outcome (p = 0.115) nor with significant differences in left ventricular systolic function (p = 0.228) or in-hospital complications (p = 0.507). Conclusion: Treatment with NSAIDs was not associated with adverse outcomes in our study cohort. Together with the findings of previous studies, our results indicate that these drugs could be safely administered in patients with myocarditis and myopericarditis.
Background: Tei index (TI) is a combined myocardial performance index, which was found to be more sensitive for overall cardiac dysfunction than systolic or diastolic parameters alone. Currently, there is only limited evidence for this measure in the context of myocarditis. Thus, TI could add additional benefits to conventional diagnostic workup. Methods: TI of patients with myocarditis (n = 40), acute coronary syndrome (n = 29) and controls (n = 50) was retrospectively analyzed concerning its discriminatory ability for myocarditis. Results: TI was most pathological in patients with myocarditis (median 0.41 vs. 0.35 vs. 0.31, p < 0.0001). Its discriminatory ability was better than that of EF or E/e’ (AUCs: TI: 0.71, p < 0.0001; EF: 0.57, p = 0.112; E/e’: 0.64, p = 0.983), which was also verified in logistic regression analysis (B(SE) = 0.81(0.23), p = 0.0004). The association of TI with myocarditis remained significant even after correction for confounders in propensity score weighted analysis. Conclusions: The TI showed a better discriminatory ability for myocarditis than conventional echocardiographic parameters. Since TI is easily conducted, it might be a helpful adjunctive tool to supplement conventional diagnostic modalities in patients with suspected myocarditis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.