Background: Fungal infections are of increasing incidence and importance in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. Timely diagnosis relies on appropriate use of laboratory testing in susceptible patients. Methods: The relevant literature related to diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, invasive candidiasis, and the common endemic mycoses was systematically reviewed. Meta-analysis was performed when appropriate. Recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: This guideline includes specific recommendations on the use of galactomannan testing in serum and BAL and for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, the role of PCR in the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, the role of β- d -glucan assays in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis, and the application of serology and antigen testing in the diagnosis of the endemic mycoses. Conclusions: Rapid, accurate diagnosis of fungal infections relies on appropriate application of laboratory testing, including antigen testing, serological testing, and PCR-based assays.

No abstract

No abstract

Rationale and Objectives With employment of both multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and endobronchial procedures in multi-center studies, effects of timing of endobronchial procedures on quantitative imaging (Q-MDCT) metrics is a question of increasing importance. Materials and Methods Six subjects were studied via MDCT at baseline, immediately following and at 4hrs and 24hrs post-BAL (right middle lobe (RML) and lingula). Through quantitative image analysis, non-air, or ‘tissue’ volume (TV) in each lung and lobe was recorded. Change in TV from baseline was used to infer retention and re-distribution of lavage fluid. Results Bronchoscopist reported unrecovered BAL volume correlated well with Q-MDCT for whole lung measures, but less well with individual lobes indicating redistribution. TV in all lobes except the RLL differed significantly (p<.05) from baseline immediately post lavage. At 24hrs, all lobes except the LLL (small 1% mean difference at 24hrs.) returned to baseline. Conclusions These findings suggest fluid movement, effecting Q-MDCT metrics, between lobes and between lungs before eventual resolution, and preclude protocols involving the lavage of one lung and imaging of the other to avoid interactions. We demonstrate that Q-MDCT is sensitive to lavage fluid retention and re-distribution, and endobronchial procedures should not precede Q-MDCT imaging by less than 24hrs.