Soft polymer materials, which are similar to human tissues, have played critical roles in modern interdisciplinary research. Compared with conventional methods, 3D printing allows rapid prototyping and mass customization and is ideal for processing soft polymer materials. However, 3D printing of soft polymer materials is still in the early stages of development and is facing many challenges including limited printable materials, low printing resolution and speed, and poor functionalities. The present review aims to summarize the ideas to address these challenges. It focuses on three points: 1) how to develop printable materials and make unprintable materials printable, 2) how to choose suitable methods and improve printing resolution, and 3) how to directly construct functional structures/systems with 3D printing. After a brief introduction on this topic, the mainstream 3D printing technologies for printing soft polymer materials are reviewed, with an emphasis on improving printing resolution and speed, choosing suitable printing techniques, developing printable materials, and printing multiple materials. Moreover, the state-of-the-art advancements in multimaterial 3D printing of soft polymer materials are summarized. Furthermore, the revolutions brought about by 3D printing of soft polymer materials for applications similar to biology are highlighted. Finally, viewpoints and future perspectives for this emerging field are discussed.
Liquid‐metal (LM)‐based flexible and stretchable electronics have attracted widespread interest in wearable computing, human–machine interaction, and soft robotics. However, many current examples are one‐off prototypes, whereas future implementation requires mass production. To address this critical challenge, an integrated multimaterial 3D printing process composed of direct ink writing (DIW) of sealing silicone elastomer and special LM‐silicone (LMS) inks for manufacturing high‐performance LM‐based flexible and stretchable electronics is presented. The LMS ink is a concentrated mixture of LM microdroplets and silicone elastomer and exhibits excellent printability for DIW printing. Guided by a verified theoretical model, a printing process with high resolution and high speed can be easily implemented. Although LMS is not initially conductive, it can be activated by pressing or freezing. Activated LMS possesses good conductivity and significant electrical response to strain. Owing to LMS's unique structure, LMS‐embedded flexible electronics exhibit great damage mitigation, in that no leaking occurs even when damaged. To demonstrate the flexibility of this process in fabricating LM‐based flexible electronics, multilayer soft circuits, strain sensors, and data gloves are printed and investigated. Notably, utilizing LMS's unique activating property, some functional circuits such as one‐time pressing/freezing‐on switch can be printed without any structural design.
3D printing of silicone elastomers with the direct ink writing (DIW) process has demonstrated great potential in areas as diverse as flexible electronics, medical devices, and soft robotics. However, most of current silicones are not printable because of their low viscosity and long curing time. The lack of systematic research on materials, devices, and processes during printing makes it a huge challenge to apply the DIW process more deeply and widely. In this report, aiming at the dilemmas in materials, devices, and processes, we proposed a comprehensive guide for printing highly stretchable silicone. Specifically, to improve the printability of silicone elastomers, nanosilica was added as a rheology modifier without sacrificing any stretching ability. To effectively control print speed and accuracy, a theoretical model was built and verified. With this strategy, silicone elastomers with different mechanical properties can all be printed and can realize infinite time and high speed printing (>25 mm/s) while maintaining accuracy. Here, superstretchable silicone that can be stretched to 2000% was printed for the first time, and complex structures can be printed with high quality. For further demonstration, prosthetic nose, data glove capable of detecting fingers' movement, and artificial muscle that can lift objects were printed directly. We believe that this work could provide a guide for further work using the DIW process to print soft matters in a wide range of application scenarios.
Photo-crosslinkable gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) has become an attractive ink in 3D printing due to its excellent biological performance. However, limited by low viscosity and long cross-linking time, it is still a challenge to directly print GelMA by extrusion-based 3D printing. Here, to balance the printability and biocompatibility, biomaterial ink composed of GelMA and nanoclay was specially designed. Using this ink, complex scaffolds with high shape fidelity can be easily printed based on the thixotropic property of nanoclay. In this study, we tried to answer some basic printing-required questions of this ink, including the printability window, general properties (porosity, mechanical strength, et al), and biocompatibility. We found that the GelMA/Nanoclay ink enabled printing complex 3D scaffolds, such as a bionic ear and a branched vessel. Furthermore, the addition of nanoclay improved the porosity, increased the mechanical strength, reduced the degradation ratio, and maintained a good biocompatibility of the printed scaffolds. Therefore, this method offers an easy way to print complex scaffolds with good shape fidelity and biological performance, and it might open up new potential applications for the customized therapy of tissue defects.
3D printing of chitosan hydrogel has attracted wide interests because of its excellent biocompatibility, antibacterial activities, biodegradability, none-toxicity and low cost. However, chitosan inks are often involved in toxic and...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.