The promoter regions of MHC class II genes are characterized by the presence of conserved sequence motifs called S,X and Y boxes, which are crucial for regulation of transcription of these genes. In humans, promoter polymorphism is known to result in differential transcriptional activity at both inter-locus and inter-allelic levels, but it is not yet known how this relates to tissue-specific expression of MHC class II molecules. We sequenced the 5' regulatory regions of alpha and beta genes of I-A and I-E molecules from four mouse haplotypes and found allelic polymorphisms which were mainly confined to the X box. The promoter sequences of I-Ea genes were non-polymorphic. Transfection of four antigen-presenting cell types with promoter-reporter gene constructs revealed that the promoter sequence polymorphisms result in distinct allele- and tissue-specific activity patterns. Mutagenesis experiments in which the X2 box was reshuffled between I-A beta alleles demonstrated that this box contributes to regulation of differential MHC class II expression in the four cell types. The possibility is discussed that tissue-specific MHC class II expression may control differentiation of T-cell subsets.
The class II transactivator is a major transcriptional factor acting on the promoters of MHC class II genes. Transcription of the CIITA gene is driven by four alternative promoters, which exhibit cell-type-specific activity. The CIITA promoter III (PIII) is constitutively active in B cells, whereas promoter IV (PIV) becomes activated upon interferon-γ activation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether these two promoters exhibit a sequence variability like the MHC class II promoters do. We isolated PIII and PIV fragments from healthy individuals and rheumatoid arthritis patients and screened them for sequence polymorphisms. Single base pair substitutions within the CIITA PIV were found in 9% of the individuals analyzed. The majority of the substitutions were located upstream of the known cis-acting elements of the promoter. PIII was non-polymorphic. To evaluate the functional relevance of the detected polymorphism we cloned variable PIV upstream of the luciferase reporter gene. Such prepared constructs were transfected into monocytes, melanoma and HeLa cells, which were subsequently stimulated with interferon-γ. The analysis of promoter activities did not reveal significant differences in all three cell types. We conclude that the level of CIITA expression does not vary within the population. Thus the differences in the level of MHC class II expression, which are observed between individuals, stem for the polymorphisms of the MHC class II promoters themselves.
In all vertebrates the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II genes are polymorphic in their coding regions as well as in their promoter control elements. This polymorphism correlates with a variability in peptide binding and a variability in transcriptional activities. There is, however, one exception to this rule, which is the mouse H2-Ea gene or the corresponding human DRA gene. So far and for unkown reasons no polymorphism has been observed in these loci. We sequenced the distal transcriptional control elements of the H2-Ea, H2-Eb, and H2-Ab genes from the mouse haplotypes H2d, H2k, H2q, and H2z, and in contrast to the promoter and coding regions a sequence polymorphism can be detected which is limited to the H2-Ea gene. In transfection experiments this polymorphism can be seen to influence haplotype-specifically the transcriptional activities in B cells. This finding strongly suggests an evolutionary pressure towards a haplotype-specific expression pattern in all four MHC class II genes. The genetic differences in control elements of MHC class II genes may well contribute to differential immune reactivities and to immune disorders like allergies or autoimmune diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.