Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Blacks are more likely than whites to experience premature disease, and they have poorer prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Multiple studies have demonstrated that blacks are less likely to be referred for certain invasive cardiac procedures. Few studies have examined the effect of race on physician and patient decision making in referrals for cardiac procedures. The authors present a framework for the complex series of steps involved in obtaining invasive cardiac care. Patient race can affect each of these steps, and differences in physician and patient race may be a particular impediment to effective communication about symptoms and preferences and to the establishment of a therapeutic partnership. The potential role of communication in race-discordant physician-patient relationships suggests a need for more research in physician decision making and for efforts to promote cultural competency as a core component of medical education.

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Blacks are more likely than whites to experience premature disease, and they have poorer prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Multiple studies have demonstrated that blacks are less likely to be referred for certain invasive cardiac procedures. Few studies have examined the effect of race on physician and patient decision making in referrals for cardiac procedures. The authors present a framework for the complex series of steps involved in obtaining invasive cardiac care. Patient race can affect each of these steps, and differences in physician and patient race may be a particular impediment to effective communication about symptoms and preferences and to the establishment of a therapeutic partnership. The potential role of communication in race-discordant physician-patient relationships suggests a need for more research in physician decision making and for efforts to promote cultural competency as a core component of medical education.

Non-invasive screenings have been widely utilized in the United States and worldwide to provide early identification of cardiovascular disease, allowing for earlier diagnosis and treatment. Screening sonography detects valve disease, cardiac dysfunction, and carotid disease in 5% to 20% of the population. This review discusses the current data regarding cardiovascular screening, the methodologies, and the resources required for performance of screenings. Cardiac and carotid sonography is highly accurate and discovers cardiovascular diseases that impact quality of life and risk of future events. Screenings are performed in a variety of settings and accuracy depends on the quality of personnel performing the non-invasive testing, the equipment utilized, and the personnel interpreting the studies. Despite the potential benefit for disease detection, population screening to detect cardiovascular disease is not widely supported by national organizations due to the theoretical cost of further testing and lack of cost versus benefit data. Additional studies are necessary to compare costs and benefits of non-invasive cardiovascular screening in the community setting.

Objective: Self-referral community cardiovascular screening programs (CCSPs) have a potential to reduce outcome events through early detection of disease. This study evaluated the characteristics of a population that could predict a positive test. Materials and Methods: Participants who completed a cardiovascular screening protocol were compared. The screening protocol included a blood pressure (BP), Doppler ankle brachial index (ABI) testing, a limited carotid sonogram, a limited aortic sonogram, electrocardiogram (ECG), and limited transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Results: Screenings were performed on 205 participants (58% female, 68 ± 9 years of age). Sixty-seven (34%) participants were abnormal in at least one of the following screening tests: ABI (2%), carotid sonogram (6%), aortic sonogram (3%), ECG (11%), and TTE (22%). Although 60.5% of the participants reported recent symptoms, there were no differences in normal or abnormal results of participants presenting with or without symptoms ( P = .06). Income was not a predictor of abnormal test results (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.55–0.97; P = .19). Multivariate analysis demonstrated, when controlling for age greater than 75 years, that participants taking BP medication was the only variable that predicted a positive test result. Conclusion: One-third of patient results were abnormal, regardless of symptoms or lack thereof, suggestive of subclinical disease. Further large-scale studies would demonstrate the role of CCSPs in risk stratifying participants.

No abstract