Human breast cancer cell lines, as well as human breast cancer biopsies, possess specific high-affinity epidermal growth factor receptors (EGF-r). However, reports on the presence of EGF-r in human breast cancer biopsies are still controversial, especially concerning the relationship between EGF-r and other biological variables whose prognostic relevance is well known, such as the estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors. In the present study, the EGF-r content was estimated in a series of 136 unselected breast cancer primaries along with cytoplasmic (ERc) and nuclear (ERn) ER and cytoplasmic PgR. EGF-binding activity consisted of a single class of high-affinity binding sites (Kd = 0.55 nM) and ranged from 0 to 275 fmol/mg protein. We observed a strong inverse association between EGF-r and ERc (p < 0.001); in fact, about two thirds of the tumors were ERc-positive/EGF-r-negative or ERc-negative/EGF-r-positive. The same type of association was found between EGF-r and either ERn or PgR.Kendall’s rank correlation test confirmed that the EGF-r concentrations were correlated with the levels of ERc (τ = -0.291, p < 0.0001), ERn (τ = -0.27, p < 0.0005) and PgR (τ = -0.162, p < 0.01). The EGF-r content was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in the ERc-negative tumors (72.6 ± 54.4 fmol/mg protein) as compared to the ERc-positive ones (33.0 ± 37.4 fmol/mg protein). Similarly, the subset of PgR-positive tumors was characterized by lower EGF-r mean concentrations when compared to PgR-negative cases (35.4 ± 54.4 vs. 63.8 ± 54.4 fmol/mg protein). These results confirm the previously described inverse relationship between EGF-r and steroid receptors. Moreover, they suggest the existence of an interaction between steroid hormones and EGF and support the need for further studies to better understand their respective roles in modulating breast cancer growth.
Estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR) appear to be a prerequisite to elicit a biologic response by a hormone-target organ. Current methodologies for analysis of these proteins (e.g., dextran-coated charcoal, DCC) in single-label assay (SLA) require relatively large amounts of tissue material, time and laboriousness. Therefore, we have developed for breast cancer tissue an improved dual-label assay (DLA) for simultaneous titration (by DCC) and/or characterization (by sedimentation properties) of ER and PgR on the same sample, using 125I-E2 and 3H-Org 2058 as tracers. The interaction of 125I-E2 with ER and plasma proteins in comparison to 3H-E2 was studied in terms of specificity, time course, affinity binding and sedimentation pattern. 125I-E2 bound the same molecular forms displayed by 3H-E2 (9 and 3S) but with lower titers (about 1.3-fold), irrespective of the technique used, and did not bind to sex hormone-binding globulin. Simultaneous detection of 125I and 3H was achieved by use of a gamma counter plus a beta counter sequentially. ER and PgR titrations with DCC in DLA were in good agreement with those obtained with SLA, in terms of titers and Ka values. An analogous result was obtained with sucrose density gradient (SDG) analysis. Both the DLA methods were highly reproducible (CV < 8.0 %). Between the rotors available for SDG, the vertical one was preferable because of the larger number of samples processed and of less purturbation of sedimenting receptor molecules. Furthermore, a biochemical application of the method is described. In conclusion, the DLA procedure, by simplifying ER and PgR estimation, makes it possible to study, even on small tumor biopsies, the molecular properties of these proteins in relation to the clinical response of the disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.