The carefully orchestrated events that result in a protective immune response are coordinated to a large extent by cytokines produced by Th1 and Th2 cell subsets. Th1 cells preferentially produce IL-2 and IFN-γ, resulting in a cellular response that helps to eliminate infected cells. In contrast, Th2 cells produce IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10, stimulating an Ab response that attacks extracellular pathogens, thereby preventing the cells from becoming infected. To elucidate the mechanisms of differential regulation of cytokine genes by these two different subsets of T cells, we established an in vitro differentiation model of freshly isolated human peripheral blood T cells in which IFN-γ was used as an index gene to study the transcriptional regulation. The data presented here demonstrate that the IFN-γ promoter undergoes differential methylation during in vitro differentiation: the promoter becomes hypermethylated in Th2 cells, whereas it is hypomethylated in Th1 cells. Hypermethylation in Th2 cells results in chromatin condensation and exclusion of CREB proteins from the IFN-γ promoter. Treatment with 5-azacytidine, a demethylating agent, causes Th2 cells to reverse histone condensation and enables CREB recruitment to the hypomethylated promoter. This results in the increased production of IFN-γ. These data indicate the importance of promoter methylation in the regulation of the IFN-γ gene during differentiation.

No abstract

Expectations are probabilistic beliefs about the future that shape and influence our perception, affect, cognition, and behavior in many contexts. This makes expectations a highly relevant concept across basic and applied psychological disciplines. When expectations are confirmed or violated, individuals can respond by either updating or maintaining their prior expectations in light of the new evidence. Moreover, proactive and reactive behavior can change the probability with which individuals encounter expectation confirmations or violations. The investigation of predictors and mechanisms underlying expectation update and maintenance has been approached from many research perspectives. However, in many instances there has been little exchange between different research fields. To further advance research on expectations and expectation violations, collaborative efforts across different disciplines in psychology, cognitive (neuro)science, and other life sciences are warranted. For fostering and facilitating such efforts, we introduce the ViolEx 2.0 model, a revised framework for interdisciplinary research on cognitive and behavioral mechanisms of expectation update and maintenance in the context of expectation violations. To support different goals and stages in interdisciplinary exchange, the ViolEx 2.0 model features three model levels with varying degrees of specificity in order to address questions about the research synopsis, central concepts, or functional processes and relationships, respectively. The framework can be applied to different research fields and has high potential for guiding collaborative research efforts in expectation research.