Background There is no widely accepted intervention in the prevention of acute mucositis during chemoradiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma. In the present double‐blind study, we tested 4 natural agents, propolis, aloe vera, calendula, and chamomile versus placebo. Methods Patients undergoing concomitant chemo‐intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were given natural agent or matched placebo; grade 3 mucositis on physical examination according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 was the primary endpoint. Various covariates were tested at logistic regression, including the individual amount of mucosa receiving at least 9.5 Gy per week (V9.5w). Results One hundred seven patients were randomized from January 2011 to July 2014, and 104 were assessable (51%‐49% were assigned to the placebo group and 53%‐51% were assigned to the natural agent). Overall, 61 patients developed peak grade 3 mucositis with no difference between arms (P = .65). Conversely, V9.5w (P = .007) and primary site (P = .037) were independent predictors. Conclusion The selected natural agents do not prevent mucositis, whereas the role of V9.5w is confirmed.

There is much evidence demonstrating that psychosocial interventions in caregivers and oncological staff produce an improvement in their patients' quality of life. The aim of this explorative study was to evaluate the effect of a new approach in promoting more functional ways to face stressful situations in the constellation of people around patients: caregivers, physicians and nurses. Thirty-four subjects were divided into three groups: 10 caregivers, 11 physicians, and 13 nurses. A “Balint Group” method modified according to a mindfulness technique was used as the intervention. Three assessment tools were administered to the participants at baseline, during, and after completion of the study: the Response Evaluation Measure (REM-71), the Satisfaction Profile (SAT-P), and the Group Climate Questionnaire (GCQ). Mean values of defense mechanisms determined by the REM-71 were compared with those of the standard population. At baseline, we observed a prevalence of immature defenses in the three groups, with mean values above those in the standard population. After the psychological intervention, a tendency to normalization of the mean values was observed, indicating the development of more adaptive ways of using defense mechanisms and the effectiveness of the intervention. Group climate, assessed through the GCQ, showed an increase in the “Engagement” factor and a decline in the “Conflict” factor in all groups. This study suggests that group treatment focused on changing personal responses to stressful situations can induce more adaptive strategies enabling caregivers, hematologists, and nurses to help patients better and thereby improve their quality of life.

NCT 02556658.

Bone metastases are commonly observed in oncologic patients with advanced disease. These metastases are considered the main cause of neoplastic pain, with more than half of oncologic patients experiencing neoplastic pain during the course of the disease due to bone involvement. Lung, breast, and prostate cancers are the primary causes of bone metastases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), especially diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequences, is the focus of our research, as it has been proven to be an optimal predictive index to assess the radiation treatment in many patients. We included patients treated with standard fractioning of radiation therapy. First, we examined the irradiated lesions with the MRI-DWI technique, before treatment and 30 and 60 days after its completion. Then we combined the MRI results and clinical parameters in a table with a predictive score for the quality of life in patients with bone metastases. This was a significant predictor of the efficacy of radiation treatment, from both clinical and psychological points of view, as it can allow an early assessment of the response to RT and therefore better scheduling of the next therapeutic steps to be performed. The table of the score we proposed helped guide patient monitoring, enabling us to undertake, where possible, follow-up with therapeutic strategies tailored to each patient's needs.