No diabetes physician would question the fact that problems relating to nerve damage in diabetes mellitus are extremely common and result in much patient morbidity and unhappiness [1]. However, as the cause and natural history of diabetic peripheral neuropathy remain unknown, attempts at defining minimal criteria for the presence of neuropathy have proved difficult [2]. This is probably the most important reason for the widely varied estimates of the prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Other factors include differing patient selection criteria, the small size of cohorts and the employment of different diagnostic tests. Some studies have used the presence of neuropathic symptoms [3] alone for the diagnosis of neuropathy while others have used both symptoms and signs of neuropathy as minimal criteria for diagnosis [4,5]. The San Antonio Conference on Diabetic Neuropathy [6] recommended that for full classification of diabetic neuropathy, at least one measure from each of the following categories need Diabetologia (1996) Summary The EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study involved the examination of 3250 randomly selected insulin-dependent diabetic patients, from 31 centres in 16 European countries. Part of the examination included an assessment of neurological function including neuropathic symptoms and physical signs, vibration perception threshold, tests of autonomic function and the prevalence of impotence. The prevalence of diabetic neuropathy across Europe was 28 % with no significant geographical differences. Significant correlations were observed between the presence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with age (p < 0.05), duration of diabetes (p < 0.001), quality of metabolic control (p < 0.001), height (p < 0.01), the presence of background or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (p < 0.01), cigarette smoking (p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001) and the presence of cardiovascular disease (p < 0.05), thus confirming previous associations. New associations have been identified from this study -namely with elevated diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.05), the presence of severe ketoacidosis (p < 0.001), an increase in the levels of fasting triglyceride (p < 0.001), and the presence of microalbuminuria (p < 0.01). All the data were adjusted for age, duration of diabetes and HbA 1c . Although alcohol intake correlated with absence of leg reflexes and autonomic dysfunction, there was no overall association of alcohol consumption and neuropathy. The reported problems of impotence were extremely variable between centres, suggesting many cultural and attitudinal differences in the collection of such information in different European countries. In conclusion, this study has identified previously known and new potential risk factors for the development of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. [Diabetologia (1996[Diabetologia ( ) 39: 1377[Diabetologia ( -1384

Meta-analyses provide more convincing evidence of a role for the ALR2-106 marker than for the microsatellite marker in diabetic nephropathy (DN). More studies are now required to confirm these results and to establish whether the ALR2-106 polymorphism has a functional role in DN.

No abstract

We have studied the temporal relationship of plasma von Willebrand Factor (vWF), a marker of endothelial damage, with the development of complications in 63 young diabetic patients (56 of whom were insulin-dependent) who took part in a prospective study. Results are presented from baseline to follow-up. In the group as a whole, no significant changes were found in any autonomic function tests, temperature discrimination threshold or nerve conduction velocities. Median motor and peroneal latency were significantly increased, while median motor, peroneal motor and sural sensory potentials were significantly decreased at follow-up compared with baseline (p < 0.001). There was a significant fall in mean plasma vWF antigen and ristocetin co-factor activity in the entire group. Within the group, we identified eight patients whose peroneal motor and sural sensory conduction velocities had decreased by over 2 ms-1. In these patients (Group A), baseline vWF antigen and activity were significantly higher than in the rest of the patients (Group B), (p = 0.04) and vWF antigen was still significantly higher after 3 years (p = 0.02). There were no differences between the groups in incidence of retinopathy, urinary albumin excretion rate or macrovascular disease. To assess the influence of glycaemic control on vWF, we first compared a matched group (C) of diabetic patients with similar HbA1 to that of group A, but with normal nerve conduction velocities: vWF was still significantly higher in group A compared with group C (p = 0.02). Furthermore, hierarchical regression showed that vWF predicted deteriorating nerve function independently of glycaemic control or the type of diabetes. Endothelial dysfunction may be associated with development of peripheral neuropathy in young diabetic patients.

We have studied the temporal relationship of plasma von Willebrand Factor (vWF), a marker of endothelial damage, with the development of complications in 63 young diabetic patients (56 of whom were insulin-dependent) who took part in a prospective study. Results are presented from baseline to follow-up. In the group as a whole, no significant changes were found in any autonomic function tests, temperature discrimination threshold or nerve conduction velocities. Median motor and peroneal latency were significantly increased, while median motor, peroneal motor and sural sensory potentials were significantly decreased at follow-up compared with baseline (p < 0.001). There was a significant fall in mean plasma vWF antigen and ristocetin co-factor activity in the entire group. Within the group, we identified eight patients whose peroneal motor and sural sensory conduction velocities had decreased by over 2 ms-1. In these patients (Group A), baseline vWF antigen and activity were significantly higher than in the rest of the patients (Group B), (p = 0.04) and vWF antigen was still significantly higher after 3 years (p = 0.02). There were no differences between the groups in incidence of retinopathy, urinary albumin excretion rate or macrovascular disease. To assess the influence of glycaemic control on vWF, we first compared a matched group (C) of diabetic patients with similar HbA1 to that of group A, but with normal nerve conduction velocities: vWF was still significantly higher in group A compared with group C (p = 0.02). Furthermore, hierarchical regression showed that vWF predicted deteriorating nerve function independently of glycaemic control or the type of diabetes. Endothelial dysfunction may be associated with development of peripheral neuropathy in young diabetic patients.