Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a renal disease characterized by proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia. In NS patients without any allergic disease, serum IgE and IgG4 levels were selectively increased, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNC) spontaneously produced IgE and IgG4. T cells produced interleukin (IL)-13 spontaneously, and B cells constitutively expressed IL-13 receptors (IL-13R). In addition, T cells stimulated surface IgE-negative (sIgE-) and sIgG4- B cells to produce IgE and IgG4, respectively, and IgE and IgG4 production was specifically blocked by anti-IL-13 antibody (Ab). MNC from atopic dermatitis (AD) patients also produced IgE and IgG4 spontaneously. However, in AD patients, T cells spontaneously produced IL-4, but not IL-13, and B cells constitutively expressed IL-4R, but not IL-13R. T cells stimulated sIgE- and sIgG4- B cells to produce IgE and IgG4, respectively, and the production was specifically blocked by anti-IL-4 Ab. On the other hand, sIgE+ and sIgG4+ B cells from both NS and AD patients spontaneously produced IgE and IgG4, respectively, and this production was not affected by T cells, anti-IL-4 Ab, or anti-IL-13 Ab. These results indicate that IL-13 is involved in the enhanced production of IgE and IgG4 in NS, while IL-4 is involved in these responses in AD.
SummaryWe studied the effects of various chemokines including neutrophil-activating peptide 2 (NAP-2), , platelet factor 4 (PF-4), melanoma growth stimulating activity (GRO), ~/interferon-induced protein (IP-10), regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted (RANTES), macrophage inflammatory protein lot (MIP-lot), MIP-1 [3, and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) on Immunoglobulin (IgE) and IgG4 production by human B cells. None of these chemokines with or without interleukin (IL-4), anti-CD40 or -CD58 monoclonal antibody (mAb), induced IgE and IgG4 production by B cells from nonatopic donors. However, RANTES and MIP-lot selectively enhanced IgE and IgG4 production induced by IL-4 plus anti-CD40 or -CD58 mAb without affecting production of IgM, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgA1, or IgA2, whereas other chemokines failed to do so. Enhancement of IgE and IgG4 production by RANTES and MIP-lot was specifically blocked by anti-RANTES mAb and anti-MIP-lot antibody (Ab), respectively, whereas anti-IL-5 mAb, anti-IL-6 mAb, anti-IL-10 Ab, anti-IL-13 Ab, and anti-tumor necrosis factor-6~ mAb failed to do so. Purified surface IgE positive (slgE +) and sIgG4 + B cells generated either in vitro or in vivo spontaneously produced IgE and IgG4, respectively, whereas slgE-and sIgG4-B cells failed to do so. RANTES and MIP-lot enhanced spontaneous IgE and IgG4 production in slgE + and sIgG4 + B cells, respectively, whereas neither RANTES nor MIP-lot did so in sIgE-or slgG4-B cells. Purified sIgE + and sIgG4 +, but not sIgE-or slgG4-B cells, generated in vitro and in vivo expressed receptors for R_ANTES and MIP-lot, whereas they failed to express receptors for other chemokines. These findings indicate that RANTES and MIP-lot enhance IgE and IgG4 production by directly stimulating slgE + and slgG4 + B cells.
We studied the effects of growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-II, and insulin on human immunoglobulin E (IgE) and IgG4 production. GH and IGF-I induced IgE and IgG4 production by normal donors' mononuclear cells (MNC) depleted of sIgE+ and sIgG4+ B cells without affecting IgM, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgA1, or IgA2 production, whereas IGF-II and insulin failed to do so. GH-induced IgE and IgG4 production was specific, and was not mediated by IGF-I, interleukin 4 (IL-4), or IL-13, since it was blocked by anti-GH antibody (Ab), but not by anti-IGF-I Ab, anti-IL-4 Ab, or anti-IL-13 Ab. Conversely, IGF-I-induced IgE and IgG4 production was blocked by anti-IGF-I Ab, but not by anti-GH Ab, anti-IL-4 Ab, or anti-IL-13 Ab. Moreover, interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) or IFN-gamma, which counteracted IL-4-and IL-13-induced IgE and IgG4 production, had no effect on induction by GH or IGF-I. In contrast to MNC, GH or IGF-I failed to induce IgE and IgG4 production by purified sIgE-, sIgG4- B cells. However, in the presence of anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody (mAb), GH or IGF-I induced IgE and IgG4 production by these cells. Purified sIgE+, but not sIgE-, B cells from atopic patients spontaneously produced IgE. GH or IGF-I with anti-CD40 mAb failed to enhance IgE production by sIgE+ B cells, whereas they induced IgE production by sIgE- B cells. Similarly, whereas GH or IGF-I with anti-CD40 mAb failed to enhance IgG4 production by sIgG4+ B cells from atopic patients, they induced IgG4 production by sIgG4- B cells. Again, neither IgE nor IgG4 induction was blocked by anti-IL-4 Ab or anti-IL-13 Ab. These results indicate that GH and IGF-I induce IgE and IgG4 production by class switching in an IL-4- and IL-13-independent mechanism.
We studied the effects of histamine on human immunoglobulin (IgE) and IgG4 production. Histamine selectively enhanced IgE and IgG4 production in purified surface IgE and IgG4 negative (sIgE-sIgG4-) B cells from normal donors stimulated with interleukin (IL)-4 plus anti-CD58 or IL-13 plus anti-CD58 monoclonal antibody (mAb) without affecting production of IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgM, IgA1, or IgA2. In cultures with IL-4 plus anti-CD58 mAb, histamine-induced enhancement of IgE and IgG4 production was specifically blocked by thioperamide (H3 receptor antagonist), and was inhibited by anti-IL-10 antibody (Ab). In contrast, in cultures with IL-13 plus anti-CD58 mAb, histamine-induced enhancement was blocked by dimaprit (H1 receptor antagonist), and was inhibited by anti-IL-6 mAb. Histamine also enhanced IgE and IgG4 production by in vivo-generated sIgE+ and sIgG4+ B cells, respectively, from atopic patients; enhancement was blocked by dimaprit and thioperamide, and was inhibited by anti-IL-6 mAb and anti-IL-10 Ab. In sIgE-sIgG4- B cells, IL-4 plus anti-CD58 mAb induced IL-10 production and IL-10 receptor expression, whereas IL-13 plus anti-CD58 mAb induced IL-6 production and IL-6 receptor expression. Histamine increased IL-10 and IL-6 production without affecting IL-10 and IL-6 receptor expression, in cultures with IL-4 plus anti-CD58 mAb and with IL-13 plus anti-CD58 mAb, respectively, which was blocked by thioperamide and dimaprit, respectively. In contrast, sIgE+ and sIgG4+ B cells spontaneously produced both IL-6 and IL-10 and constitutively expressed IL-6 and IL-10 receptors, and histamine increased IL-6 and IL-10 production without affecting IL-6 or IL-10 receptor expression, which was blocked by thioperamide and dimaprit. These results indicate that histamine enhanced IgE and IgG4 production by increasing endogenous IL-6 and IL-10 production via H1 and H3 receptors, respectively.
The effects of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) on human IgA1 and IgA2 production were studied. In unfractionated small resting B cells stimulated with anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody (mAb), VIP induced IgA1 and IgA2 production without affecting the production of IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgM, or IgE. When small B cells were separated into sIgA1+, sIgA2+, sIgA1- and sIgA2- B cells, anti-CD40 mAb plus VIP induced IgA1 and IgA2 production by surface IgA1- (sIgA1-) and sIgA2- B cells, respectively, while having no effect on sIgA1+ and sIgA2+ B cells. This induction by VIP was specific, since anti-CD40 mAb plus other neuropeptides, i.e., somatostatin or substance P, had no effect, and moreover, the induction was specifically blocked by a VIP antagonist. Further, anti-CD40 mAb plus various cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, transforming growth factor-beta, low molecular weight B cell growth factor, and interferon-gamma, did not induce IgA1 and IgA2 production by sIgA1- and sIgA2- B cells, respectively. These results indicate that in the presence of anti-CD40 mAb, VIP induces IgA1 and IgA2 production by isotype switching.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.