Maxillary bone reconstruction in combination with placement of dental implants is a treatment modality reported since 1980 for patients suffering from maxillary atrophy and difficulties with wearing removable prosthesis. This study reports on patient experience and satisfaction among 88 consecutive patients concerning surgical and prosthetic aspects of their treatment. A questionnaire was used to gather the data. Patient satisfaction was measured on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 = bad/few, 5 = very good/much). The satisfaction index with regard to the total treatment was 4.1 +/- 0.9. A total of 90% of the patients responded that they would go through the treatment again or recommend the treatment to a friend if necessary. The post-operative pain index scored 2.6 +/- 1.2. The acceptation of the post-operative pain at the crista iliaca was 86.1% and of the maxilla 89.9%. It is concluded that the results of measurements of patient satisfaction after maxillary bone reconstruction in combination with placement of dental implants were acceptable.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the soft-tissue health around 470 implants placed in the upper jaw of 88 patients with severe maxillary atrophy. All patients underwent a reconstruction procedure which included a composite bone grafting from the iliac crest to the maxillary sinus. Evaluation was performed at a mean implant lifetime of 21.6+/-10.9 months. The following parameters were used: probing depth, plaque-, gingival-, bleeding index and width of the buccal keratinized mucosa. They were calculated as means for each implant and related to the type of superstructure and the thickness of the original sinus floor. (higher or lower than 5 mm). A high percentage of bleeding on probing was observed in obviously clinically healthy peri-implant pockets. Bleeding on probing and deeper probing depth were especially observed in the group with severe maxillary atrophy (less than 5 mm initial height of the sinus floor.) There was a significant increase in mean peri-implant probing depth and gingiva index in overdentures versus fixed bridges. No differences were observed with respect to the width of the keratinized buccal mucosa. It was concluded that implants in the reconstructed maxilla and supporting overdentures had a higher risk for bone loss, based on the worse peri-implant tissue health observed.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the material behaviour and nature of implant-supported superstructures in function. A total of 37 overdentures, 26 fixed partial and 13 fixed full dentures with a mean lifetime of 40 months were clinically evaluated in relation to damage, occlusion and articulation, parafunction, retentive devices, hygiene and speech problems. In general 70% of all superstructures were damaged. Fixed partial dentures were significantly less damaged than overdentures and fixed full dentures (P<0.001). A significant high percentage of newly gained parafunction was found (P<0.05).