Background:
Magnusiomyces clavatus
and
Magnusiomyces capitatus
are emerging yeasts with intrinsic resistance to many commonly used antifungal agents. Identification is difficult, and determination of susceptibility patterns with commercial and reference methods is equally challenging. For this reason, few data on invasive infections by
Magnusiomyces
spp. are available.
Objectives: To determine the epidemiology and susceptibility of
Magnusiomyces
isolates from bloodstream infections (BSI) isolated in Germany and Austria from 2001-2020.
Methods: In seven institutions a total of 34
Magnusiomyces
BSI were identified. Identification was done by ITS sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS. Antifungal susceptibility was determined by EUCAST broth microdilution and gradient tests.
Results: Of the 34 isolates,
M. clavatus
was more common (N=24) compared to
M. capitatus
(N=10). BSI by
Magnusiomyces
spp. were more common in men (62%) and mostly occurred in patients with haemato-oncological malignancies (79%). The highest
in vitro
antifungal activity against
M. clavatus
/
M. capitatus
was observed for voriconazole (MIC
50
0.03/0.125 mg/L), followed by posaconazole (MIC
50
0.125/0.25 mg/L).
M. clavatus
isolates showed overall lower MICs compared to
M. capitatus
.
With the exception of amphotericin B, low essential agreement between gradient test and microdilution was recorded for all antifungals (0-70%). Both species showed distinct morphologic traits on ChromAgar Orientation and Columbia blood agar, which can be used for differentiation if no MALDI-TOF or molecular identification is available.
Conclusion: Most BSI were caused by
M. clavatus.
The lowest MICs were recorded for voriconazole. Gradient tests demonstrated unacceptably low agreement and should preferably not be used for susceptibility testing of
Magnusiomyces
spp.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.