This study indicates that circulating progenitors of bone marrow origin give rise to cells with smooth muscle-like properties during formation of neointimal thickenings in the arterial wall after allotransplantation and after balloon injury. A segment of abdominal aorta was transplanted from female F344 to male LEW rats, and the grafts were analyzed for male cells by using the gene as a marker. Immunostaining demonstrated that CD45-positive leukocytes made up 35-45% of the neointimal cells during the 8-week period examined. Concurrently, up to 70% of the neointimal cells were of host origin, as shown by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the gene (Y chromosome). This suggests that the neointima contained host cells also of noninflammatory character. Accordingly, many cells positive for smooth-muscle alpha-actin were detected in this layer. To explore the possible bone marrow origin of allograft cells, female LEW rats were irradiated and substituted with bone marrow from male LEW rats. Subsequently, the animals received an aortic transplant from female F344 rats or were exposed to a balloon injury of the carotid artery. Immunostaining and real-time polymerase chain reaction confirmed the above findings, but the fractions of leukocytes and -positive cells were lower in the carotids than in the allografts. Combined primed in situ labeling and immunostaining verified that not only inflammatory but also smooth muscle-like cells of male origin appeared in the vessel wall in both situations. These observations suggest that the smooth-muscle cells that participate in the development of neointimal lesions during vascular disease may, in part, originate from circulating progenitors.

Summary Microchimerism after allogeneic organ transplantation has been widely documented using DNA identification techniques. However, the question as to whether the detected donor DNA is present in the surviving donor passenger cells, recipient macrophages phagocytizing rejected donor cells, or dendritic cells (DC) internalizing donor apoptotic bodies or cell fragments has not been answered. We provide evidence that allogeneic organ transplantation is followed not only by cellular microchimerism caused by release of graft passenger cells but also dissemination of donor DNA from the ischemic rejecting graft cells and its internalization in recipient DC. The high levels of donor DNA at the time of heart rejection were inversely proportional to the concentration of donor passenger cells detected with use of flow cytometry. Depending on the type of graft, the kinetics of DNA distribution in recipient tissues were different. Immunosuppressive drugs attenuated the rejection reaction and release of DNA from grafts. Allogeneic but not syngeneic donor DNA fragments were found in recipient splenic DC‐enriched population. Interestingly, that donor DNA fragments could be detected in recipient tissue at high levels on day 30. This challenges the notion that fragments of DNA are immediately cleaved by cell plasmatic enzymes. The biologic significance of our findings is not clear. We speculate that donor DNA fragments in recipient DC may play a, so far unknown, role in the immunization/tolerance process to allogeneic antigens.

No abstract

No abstract

The transplanted limb contains bone marrow tissue. The hematopoietic cells contained in the bone of the graft normally differentiate after transplantation and can be released to the recipient. The cells migrate to the recipient bone marrow cavities and lymphoid organs. This causes the immune reaction between the donor and the recipient, which develops not only in the graft itself but also in the recipient immune organs where donor bone marrow cells home. The purpose of this study was to investigate the process of migration of the hematopoietic cells from the donor limb to the recipient bone marrow cavities and lymphoid tissues. The questions the authors asked were: what is the rate of release of bone marrow cells from the transplanted bone, where do the released bone marrow cells home in the recipient, how fast are donor bone marrow cells rejected by the recipient, and can some bone marrow cells homing in the recipient tissues survive and create a state of microchimerism. Experiments were performed on Brown Norway and Lewis inbred rat strains (n = 30). Limb donors received intravenous chromium-51-labeled bone marrow cells. Twenty-four hours later, the limb with homing labeled bone marrow cells was transplanted to an allogeneic or syngeneic recipient. The rate of radioactivity of bone marrow cells released from the graft and homing in recipient tissues was measured after another 24 hours. To eliminate factors adversely affecting homing such as the "crowding effect" and allogeneic elimination of bone marrow cells by natural killer cells, total body irradiation and antiasialo-GM1 antiserum were applied to recipients before limb transplantation. In rats surviving with the limb grafts for 7 and 30 days, homing of donor bone marrow cells was studied by specific labeling of donor cells and flow cytometry as well as by detecting donor male Y chromosome. The authors found that transplantation of the limb with bone marrow in its natural spatial relationship with stromal cells and blood perfusion brings about immediate but low-rate release of bone marrow cells and their migration to recipient bone marrow and lymphoid tissues. Large portions of allogeneic bone marrow cells are rapidly destroyed in the mechanism of allogeneic elimination by radioresistant but antiasialo-GM1-sensitive natural killer cells. Some transplanted bone marrow cells remain in the recipient's tissues and create a state of cellular and DNA microchimerism. A low number of physiologically released donor bone marrow cells do not seem to adversely affect the clinical outcome of limb grafting. Quite the opposite, a slight prolongation of the graft survival time was observed.