The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic brought profound change to the medical education system, and residency and fellowship recruitment was not spared. Many of the activities required for recruitment of new fellows (e.g., airline travel and face-to-face meetings) were not able to be safely done. The rapid shift to all-virtual interviewing brought logistical challenges but, as the season concluded, called into question the value and validity of prior protocols. Our institutions (University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland, Ohio) designed surveys to collect both applicants’ and interviewers’ perspectives on the virtual interview process for the 2020–2021 recruitment season to identify the challenges virtual interviews may bring to the current paradigm and what that may mean for the value of the traditional in-person model. Our results show that the absence of certain aspects of in-person interviews (e.g., travel costs and time required off-service) were welcome changes to both applicants and interviewers. However, there were new challenges identified, such as lack of formal training for virtual interviews and a shift in applicants’ attention to fellowship program websites. We discuss how these observations could inform best practices for programs and applicants in the future.

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is the preferred diagnostic modality for sampling mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes (LNs). The conventional needle used for sampling is either a 21-gauge (21G) or 22-gauge (22G). A 25-gauge (25G) needle has recently been introduced with little known regarding its efficacy.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients referred for EBUS-TBNA who had LNs sampled using a 25G or 22G needle. A propensity score matching analysis was performed. After matching the groups, each LN was assessed for adequacy and final diagnosis. Non-diagnostic and benign lymphoid specimens were compared with repeat biopsy findings or long-term clinical and radiological follow-up.Results: A total of 158 LNs were included. An adequate sample was obtained in 92.4% (73/79) in the 25G group and 92.4% (73/79) in the 22G group (P=1). The 25G group diagnosed benign lymphoid tissue in 82.3% (65/79), granuloma in 7.6% (6/79) and malignancy in 2.5% (2/79). Six lymph nodes in the 25G group were non-diagnostic (7.6%). The 22G group diagnosed benign lymphoid tissue in 83.5% (66/79), granuloma in 3.8% (3/79) and malignancy in 5.1% (4/79). Six lymph nodes in the 22G group were non-diagnostic (7.6%).The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy in the 25G group was 88.9% (95% CI, 51.8-99.7%), 100% (95% CI, 92.1-100%), 97.8% (95% CI, 87.6-99.7%) and 98.2% (95% CI, 90.1-100%), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV and diagnostic accuracy in the 22G group was 77.8% (95% CI, 40-97.2%), 100% (95% CI, 86.8-100%), 92.9% (95% CI, 79.3-97.8%) and 94.3% (95% CI, 80.8-99.3%), respectively. The 25G and 22G group were comparable in diagnostic accuracy (P=0.7). Conclusions:The 25G and 22G needle achieve comparable specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy in EBUS-TBNA.

Many deceased by neurologic criteria donors are administered inhalational agents during organ recovery surgery-a process that is characterised by warm and cold ischaemia followed by warm reperfusion. In certain settings, volatile anaesthetics (VA) are known to precondition organs to protect them from subsequent ischaemia-reperfusion injury. As such, we hypothesised that exposure to VA during organ procurement would improve post-graft survival. Lifebanc (organ procurement organisation [OPO] for NE Ohio) provided the investigators with a list of death by neurologic criteria organ donors cared for at three large tertiary hospitals in Cleveland between 2006 and 2016-details about the surgical recovery phase were extracted from the organ donors' medical records. De-identified data on graft survival were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). The collated data underwent comparative analysis based on whether or not VA were administered during procurement surgery. Records from 213 donors were obtained for analysis with 138 exposed and 75 not exposed. Demographics, medical histories, and organ procurement rates were similar between the two cohorts. For the primary endpoint, there were no significant differences observed in either early (30-day) or late (five-year) graft survival rates for kidney, liver, lung, or heart transplants. Our findings from this retrospective review of a relatively small cohort do not support the hypothesis that the use of VA during the surgical procurement phase improves graft survival. Reviews of larger datasets and/or a prospective study may be required to provide a definitive answer.