In order to improve targeted therapeutic approaches for asthma patients, insights into the molecular mechanisms that differentially contribute to disease phenotypes, such as obese asthmatics or severe asthmatics, are required. Here we report immunological and microbiome alterations in obese asthmatics (n = 50, mean age = 45), non-obese asthmatics (n = 53, mean age = 40), obese non-asthmatics (n = 51, mean age = 44) and their healthy counterparts (n = 48, mean age = 39). Obesity is associated with elevated proinflammatory signatures, which are enhanced in the presence of asthma. Similarly, obesity or asthma induced changes in the composition of the microbiota, while an additive effect is observed in obese asthma patients. Asthma disease severity is negatively correlated with fecal Akkermansia muciniphila levels. Administration of A. muciniphila to murine models significantly reduces airway hyper-reactivity and airway inflammation. Changes in immunological processes and microbiota composition are accentuated in obese asthma patients due to the additive effects of both disease states, while A. muciniphila may play a non-redundant role in patients with a severe asthma phenotype.

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the world. It continues to have an enormous impact on health systems of all countries. The number of new cases is increasing in a rate of about 3% annually. Despite the advances in the detection and treatment of lung cancer, the overall 5-year survival still remains grim. Cigarette smoking remains the major risk factor on the incidence of cancer, with 90% of all lung cancers occurring in smokers. The frequency of different types of lung cancer is changing. Adenocarcinoma has become the most frequent histologic type (approximately 50%) while squamous, previously the most common, accounts for approximately one third of lung cancers, and small cell cancer for 15%. Prognosis is influenced by the stage of the disease at diagnosis and by the treatment. Screening trials that have begun in the early 1950s based on chest X-ray and sputum cytology did not produce improvement in overall mortality. Refinements in the staging classification of lung cancer and advances in stage identification were introduced in the 1990s. Post surgical mortality has declined since the 1950s but the 5-year survival rates have improved only minimally. A gradual improvement is seen in locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer, mainly due to addition of advanced chemotherapy and radical radiotherapy. Chemotherapy offers small improvement for patients with NSCLC. The management of small cell lung cancer, which appeared so promising in the 1970s has hit a plateau with vary little advance in the last years. The biological active agents currently in phase III trails offer some hope in the advance of therapy of lung cancer. The most important and cost-effective management for lung cancer is smoking cessation, but for those with this disease novel methods of treatment are urgently needed.

The data show that the NEXThaler DPI is an efficient device for the management of persistent asthma. The evaluation of the inhalation profiles through the NEXThaler DPI demonstrates that device activation and consistent dose delivery occurs at patient achievable inhalation flow rates, and supports the broad utility of the NEXThaler DPI in patients with asthma. Overall, all the effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction outcomes demonstrate the NEXThaler DPI is easy to use.

No abstract

Amendments to the European pharmacovigilance legislative framework are expected to come into force in 2011, following the adoption of the proposed amendments to Directive 2001/83/EC on the community code relating to medicinal products for human use (hereinafter referred to as the Directive) and to Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004 laying down community procedures for the authorization and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (EMA) [hereinafter referred to as the Regulation]. The Regulation shall apply 18 months after publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The amendments to the Directive and the Regulation will induce changes in the EU in terms of evaluation of risk associated with medicinal products as well as the framework on how the EU takes harmonized regulatory action on drug safety. In this review, the text agreed between the European Parliament and Council is examined and compared with the pharmacovigilance legislative framework currently in force. We argue that the new legislation has improved numerous uncertainties in current legislative framework and provides for the following: (i) clear roles, responsibilities and obligations for the key responsible parties; (ii) rationalization of EU decision making on drug safety issues in order to deliver measures that are equally and fully implemented for all relevant products across the community with a view to preventing unnecessary patient exposure to risks; (iii) strengthening medicine safety transparency and communication so that the understanding and trust of patients and health professionals in the safety of medicines will improve, as well as the penetration of key warnings; (iv) strengthening companies' pharmacovigilance systems, allowing companies to improve their systems constantly while reducing administrative burden; (v) ensuring the proactive and proportionate collection of high-quality data relevant to the safety of medicines through risk management and structured data collection in the form of Post-Authorization Safety Studies (PASS), together with rationalized single-case and periodic reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs); (vi) involvement of stakeholders in pharmacovigilance through direct patient reporting of suspected ADRs and inclusion of patients and healthcare professionals in decision making; and (vii) simplification of the current community pharmacovigilance procedures with consequent efficiency gains for both the pharmaceutical industry and medicines regulators. For the first time, companies can be made legally liable to carry out PASS and Post-Authorization Efficacy Studies. The amendments to the Regulation and to the Directive will strengthen the European network on pharmacovigilance. A Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) based at the EMA will be set up, which will be responsible for all matters related to pharmacovigilance at an EU level. Three European databases will be strengthened (EudraVigilance, EudraPharm and the Europ...