The use of interferon for the induction treatment of multiple myeloma has been shown to be effective in about 20 percent of patients. We studied its effects on long-term survival when it was used for maintenance treatment. Between April 1985 and May 1988, 101 patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma who had had a substantial objective response or a lesser objective response with disappearance of symptoms ("disease stabilization") after 12 courses of induction chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive recombinant interferon alfa-2b as maintenance therapy (n = 50) or to receive no treatment (n = 51). As of December 1989, 66 of the 101 patients have relapsed (25 given interferon and 41 not treated). The median duration of response (from the time of randomization) was 26 months in the patients given interferon and 14 months in the untreated patients (P = 0.0002). A total of 37 patients have died (14 given interferon and 23 not treated). The median duration of survival (from randomization) was 52 months in the interferon group and 39 months in the control group (P = 0.0526). Among the patients who had had a substantial objective response to induction chemotherapy, the difference in survival time was statistically significant (P = 0.03526). Interferon had to be stopped because of toxic effects in 3 of 12 patients initially treated with 10 MU (megaunits) per square meter of body-surface area. After the dose was reduced to 3 MU per square meter, the only toxic effect was a mild influenza-like syndrome lasting two to three weeks. We conclude that maintenance treatment with interferon prolongs response and survival in patients with multiple myeloma who have responded to conventional induction chemotherapy.
The kinetics of bone marrow plasma cells were evaluated by means of in vitro 3(H)thymidine incorporation in 143 patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Fifty-three patients had symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) at diagnosis, nine were in stable remission, six in unstable remission, and 16 in the relapse phase. Thirty-seven patients were classified has having monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and 22 as smouldering myeloma (SM). A thymidine labelling index (LI%) of greater than 3 at initial diagnosis predicted a very short survival. High LI% values (median 2.8 +/- 1.1) were also seen at relapse. However, the major new finding was that the LI% could be used to discriminate precisely between the SM-MGUS group and the MM patients including stage I disease (P less than 0.0001). Only one patient developed MM during follow up, that being 8 months after the initial diagnosis of SM. During the unmaintained stable remission (plateau) phase a low proliferative activity was also observed (LI% = 0.6 +/- 0.2). Thus the LI% was extremely useful in identification of both poor risk groups with a LI% greater than 3 and stable patients requiring no immediate therapy with a LI% less than 1. The ability to discriminate between MGUS and SM and stage I MM should prove particularly useful clinically.
The efficacy of alternating vincristine, melphalan (M), cyclophosphamide, prednisone/vincristine, carmustine, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VMCP/VBAP) polychemotherapy was compared with the M and prednisone (MP) regimen as induction treatment in multiple myeloma (MM). Three hundred four MM patients entered this study between March 1983 and July 1986; the analysis was performed in December 1989. The treatment groups did not show significant differences with respect to major prognostic factors. Median overall survival was 33.8 months. In the VMCP/VBAP and MP arms, after 12 induction chemotherapy cycles, 59.0% and 47.3% (P less than .068) of the patients achieved an M component reduction greater than 50%. No significant difference was observed in the two treatment arms in terms of remission duration (21.3 v 19.6 months, P less than .66) and survival (31.6 v 37.0 months, P less than .28). Patients younger than 65 years did not show any advantage from the alternating polychemotherapy. At diagnosis, the plasma cell labeling index (LI) and serum beta-2 microglobulin (beta 2-m) were evaluated in 173 and 183 patients, respectively. A significantly reduced survival was observed for patients with LI greater than or equal to 2% (16.4 months) or beta 2-m greater than or equal to 6 mg/L (20.4 months). Even in these poor-risk subgroups, VMCP/VBAP was not superior to MP.
In order to assess the prognostic value of rapid tumor mass reduction in responding multiple myeloma (MM) patients, 100 consecutive patients were analyzed, and bone marrow plasma cell kinetic characteristics were evaluated at diagnosis. Forty-two patients obtained a tumor mass reduction greater than or equal to 50% with three cycles of chemotherapy and within 3 months (early responder myeloma [ERM]), and 23 in greater than 3 months (slow responder myeloma [SRM]). Survival rates in these two groups were not statistically different (P = .07). The labeling index (LI) of bone marrow plasma cells was significantly higher in ERM patients than in SRM patients (1.8 +/- 2.0 v 0.8 +/- 0.7, P = .006). The LI was used to separate the ERM patients into two well-defined subgroups. ERM patients with a LI greater than or equal to 2% showed a median survival of 16.4 months, whereas ERM patients with a LI less than 2% did not reach the median survival at 46.9 months (P less than .0044). Remission duration was also significantly different: 12.2 months in the high LI subgroup and 26.3 months in the low LI subgroup (P less than .0025). Early response itself does not correspond to shorter remission duration and shorter survival, but it is a poor prognostic factor if associated with a high plasma cell proliferative activity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.