The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes (within six months) after short stripping (SS) and endovenous laser obliteration (EVLO) in patients with varicose veins when analyzing ultrasound findings, postoperative complications, level of postoperative pain, clinical manifestations, and duration of rehabilitation after the intervention. Patients with varicose veins of lower extremities and insufficiency of large saphenous vein valves had either EVLO or SS with miniflebectomy. All patients were examined before surgery and then in 5 days, 10 days and in 1, 3 and 6 months after it. The patients also had clinical examination, ultrasound duplex scanning of their lower extremity veins; Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) was also used for the trial. Pain was assessed during the first 10 days after the surgery using a 10-point pain assessment scale. 156 patients (177 lower extremities) were followed-up for 6 months. As the results of our study showed, endovenous laser obliteration and short stripping were equally effective in eliminating the reflux of the great saphenous vein (GSV). After 6 months of follow-up, the reflux along the medial inflow was noted in one case in SS group; partial GSV recanalization was noted in one case in EVLO group in 3 months, in 3 cases – in 6 months. Besides, despite LMH preventive doses one patient from EVLO group had EHIT II deep vein thrombosis. The obtained outcomes have demonstrated that EVLO and SS have similar effectiveness and safety. No difference has been found between these two types of treatment, except more pronounced postoperative pain and bruising in SS group. Performed care was equally safe and effective in eliminating GSV reflux, in relieving symptoms and eliminating varicose veins as well as in improving the quality of life. Long-term outcomes, especially the rate of relapses depending on the type of intervention, are to be investigated in future trials.

Статья представляет собой обзор данных литературы о двух противоположных подходах к хирургическому лечению варикозной болезни нижних конечностей: радикальном и сберегательном. Сравниваются радикальный принцип-классическая флебэктомия, эндовенозные методы термооблитерации и сберегательный принцип-гемодинамически обоснованные веносохраняющие методы: ASVAL, CHIVA, короткий стриппинг. Освещены вопросы о месте и протяженности стриппинга в современной хирургии. Частичное или полное сохранение ствола большой подкожной вены (БПВ) в дополнение к эндовенозным методам облитерации является эффективной и безопасной модификацией хирургического вмешательства. Стриппинг актуален, когда хирурги не могут прибегнуть к эндовазальным вмешательствам при клинических, анатомических или технических ограничениях. Короткий стриппинг при отсутствии тотального рефлюкса в БПВ, по сравнению с тотальным удалением ствола, является более безопасным методом.