Buprenorphine is commonly used as ( part of ) postoperative analgesic treatment with dosage dependent side-effects such as pica behaviour. No strict consensus exists about the optimal dosing interval of buprenorphine, as its duration of action has been described as being in the range of 6 -12 h. In this study, dosing intervals of 8 h (thrice-a-day) and 12 h (twice-a-day) for buprenorphine in a multimodal analgesic strategy (concurrent administration of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) were compared on food intake, weight and side-effects (gnawing on plastic Petri dishes and growth rate, indicative of pica behaviour) in rats. The food intake and weight of both intervals were comparable, as the animals from the twice-a-day group did not lose more weight or consumed less food during the analgesic period. The rats from the thrice-a-day group suffered from more side-effects, as the growth rate was decreased and more plastic was gnawed on. It is recommended to carefully evaluate analgesic and side-effects when using buprenorphine. When side-effects are observed, the possibility of increasing the dosing interval of buprenorphine should be explored. In this study, increasing the dosing interval of buprenorphine in a multimodal analgesic regimen resulted in reduced unwanted side-effects, without increasing weight loss or decreasing food intake. Although this is suggestive of provision of comparable analgesia, future studies including more pain-related readout parameters to assess the effect of the dosing interval on analgesic efficacy are recommended.

When using rats in pain research, strain-related differences in outcomes of tests for pain and nociception are acknowledged. However, very little is known about the specific characteristics of these strain differences. In this study four phylogenetically distant inbred rat strains, i.e. Wistar Kyoto (WKY), Fawn Hooded (FH), Brown Norway (BN) and Lewis (LE), were investigated in different tests related to pain and nociception. During Pavlovian fear conditioning, the LE and WKY showed a significantly longer duration of freezing behaviour than the FH and BN. Additionally, differences in c-Fos expression in subregions of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala between rat strains during retrieval and expression of conditioned fear were found. For example, the BN did not show recruitment of the basolateral amygdala, whereas the WKY, FH and LE did. During the hot plate test, the WKY and LE showed a lower thermal threshold compared to the BN and FH. In a follow-up experiment, the two most contrasting strains regarding behaviour during the hot plate test and Pavlovian fear conditioning (i.e. FH and WKY) were selected and the hot plate test, Von Frey test and somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) were investigated. During the Von Frey test, the WKY showed a lower mechanical threshold compared to the FH. When measuring the SEP, the FH appeared to be less reactive to increasing stimulus intensities when considering both peak amplitudes and latencies. Altogether, the combined results indicate various differences between rat strains in Pavlovian fear conditioning, nociception related behaviours and nociceptive processing. These findings demonstrate the necessity of using multiple rat strains when using tests including noxious stimuli and suggest that the choice of rat strains should be considered. When selecting a strain for a particular study it should be considered how this strain behaves during the tests used in that study.

Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) are used in humans and animals to increase knowledge about nociception and pain. Since the SEP in humans increases when noxious stimuli are administered unpredictably, predictability potentially influences the SEP in animals as well. To assess the effect of predictability on the SEP in animals, classical fear conditioning was applied to compare SEPs between rats receiving SEP-evoking electrical stimuli either predictably or unpredictably. As in humans, the rat’s SEP increased when SEP-evoking stimuli were administered unpredictably. These data support the hypothesis that the predictability of noxious stimuli plays a distinctive role in the processing of these stimuli in animals. The influence of predictability should be considered when studying nociception and pain in animals. Additionally, this finding suggests that animals confronted with (un)predictable noxious stimuli can be used to investigate the mechanisms underlying the influence of predictability on central processing of noxious stimuli.