No abstract

Whales contribute to marine ecosystem functioning, and they may play a role in mitigating climate change and supporting the Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) population, a keystone prey species that sustains the entire Southern Ocean (SO) ecosystem. By analyzing a five-decade (1971-2017) data series of individual southern right whales (SRWs; Eubalaena australis) photo-identified at Península Valdés, Argentina, we found a marked increase in whale mortality rates following El Niño events. By modeling how the population responds to changes in the frequency and intensity of El Niño events, we found that such events are likely to impede SRW population recovery and could even cause population decline. Such outcomes have the potential to disrupt food-web interactions in the SO, weakening that ecosystem's contribution to the mitigation of climate change at a global scale.

A small population of coastal bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus gephyreus) inhabits the inland waters of Laguna, southern Brazil. A subset of this population interacts with artisanal fishermen. This specialized foraging tactic structures dolphin society into ‘cooperatives' (participants of the interaction) and ‘non‐cooperatives' (non‐participants). Between 2012 and 2015, a bridge was constructed in Laguna over an important core area for dolphins. Photo‐identification and georeferenced data collected on boat surveys, conducted both before and during bridge construction, were used to evaluate changes in both ‘cooperative' and ‘non‐cooperative' dolphin distribution. Changes in dolphin distribution were analysed with kernel densities and hurdle models. A grid of 120 cells of area 1 km2 was used to model dolphin distribution, and the minimum distance from the grid cell centre to the bridge and to the area of gillnet use were defined as explanatory variables of human activities. Habitat descriptors (depth and distance) from the lagoon margin were also considered in the model procedure. Dolphin distribution patterns shifted between periods. A core area used by ‘non‐cooperative' dolphins near the bridge construction works disappeared. The effects of habitat descriptor and anthropogenic activity on dolphin distribution also differed between periods. Before bridge construction, the abundance of ‘non‐cooperative' dolphin was higher close to the bridge area (p < 0.05). During bridge construction, the presence of ‘cooperative' and ‘non‐cooperative' dolphins decreased significantly with the distance from gillnet fishing activity (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively). This study highlights the importance of accounting for individual variations in response when assessing the effects of a habitat disturbance, or when implementing conservation plans.

No abstract