Availability of information is one of the most important factors for financial decision-makers. Having complete information about the probability of losing money should always leave decision-makers better off. However, in some situations financial decision-makers prefer to know less than more. In this study we investigated the impact of selected characteristics of financial threats on individuals' decisions to avoid risk information in an incentivised online experiment. We found that threat severity, relative risk, and effectiveness of threat prevention alone do not influence decisions to avoid risk information. However, we did find an interaction effect between the first two treatments. Furthermore, our data suggest that coping style, locus of control, and anticipated emotional response are statistically significant predictors of financial risk information avoidance.

A key prerequisite for precision medicine is the ability to assess metrics of human behavior objectively, unobtrusively and continuously. This capability serves as a framework for the optimization of tailored, just-in-time precision health interventions. Mobile unobtrusive physiological sensors, an important prerequisite for realizing this vision, show promise in implementing this quality of physiological data collection. However, first we must trust the collected data. In this paper, we present a novel approach to improving heart rate estimates from wrist pulse photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors. We also discuss the impact of sensor movement on the veracity of collected heart rate data.

ABSTRACT. The aim of the research was to identify the nature of the relationship between corporate reputation and individuals' investment decisions. We focused on three reputational factors that influence such decisions: value of stock market analysts' recommendation (either neutral or positive), reputation value (either positive or negative), and reputation domain (either ethical or financial). We tested two hypotheses in an online experiment and we have confirmed that investors are more sensitive to firm's financial rather than to its ethical reputation. However, we could not confirm that a reputation damage has a stronger impact on changes in the planned investment's value than an improvement in company's reputation.

No abstract