Systemic and localised adverse effects of local anaesthetic drugs usually occur because of excessive dosage, rapid absorption or inadvertent intravascular injection. Small children are more prone than adults to methaemoglobinaemia, and the combination of sulfonamides and prilocaine, even when correctly administered, should be avoided in this age group. The incidence of true allergy to local anaesthetics is rare. All local anaesthetics can cause CNS toxicity and cardiovascular toxicity if their plasma concentrations are increased by accidental intravenous injection or an absolute overdose. Excitation of the CNS may be manifested by numbness of the tongue and perioral area, and restlessness, which may progress to seizures, respiratory failure and coma. Bupivacaine is the local anaesthetic most frequently associated with seizures. Treatment of CNS toxicity includes maintaining adequate ventilation and oxygenation, and controlling seizures with the administration of thiopental sodium or benzodiazepines. Cardiovascular toxicity generally begins after signs of CNS toxicity have occurred. Bupivacaine and etidocaine appear to be more cardiotoxic than most other commonly used local anaesthetics. Sudden onset of profound bradycardia and asystole during neuraxial blockade is of great concern and the mechanism(s) remains largely unknown. Treatment of cardiovascular toxicity depends on the severity of effects. Cardiac arrest caused by local anaesthetics should be treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation procedures, but bupivacaine-induced dysrhythmias may be refractory to treatment. Many recent reports of permanent neurological complications involved patients who had received continuous spinal anaesthesia through a microcatheter. Injection of local anaesthetic through microcatheters and possibly small-gauge spinal needles results in poor CSF mixing and accumulation of high concentrations of local anaesthetic in the areas of the lumbosacral nerve roots. In contrast to bupivacaine, the hyperbaric lidocaine (lignocaine) formulation carries a substantial risk of neurotoxicity when given intrathecally. Drugs altering plasma cholinesterase activity have the potential to decrease hydrolysis of ester-type local anaesthetics. Drugs inhibiting hepatic microsomal enzymes, such as cimetidine, may allow the accumulation of unexpectedly high (possibly toxic) blood concentrations of lidocaine. Reduction of hepatic blood flow by drugs or hypotension will decrease the hepatic clearance of amide local anaesthetics. Special caution must be exercised in patients taking digoxin, calcium antagonists and/or beta-blockers.

Among all the drugs used for general anaesthesia, neuromuscular blockers appear to play a prominent role in the incidence of severe adverse reactions. It now seems likely that most serious adverse drug reactions occurring during anaesthesia are immunological in type. The frequency of life-threatening anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions occurring during anaesthesia has been estimated to be between 1 in 1000 and 1 in 25,000 anaesthetic procedures, with the neuromuscular blockers being involved in 80% of cases. The mortality from such serious reactions is reported to be in the range of 3.4 to 6%. The highly immunogenic drug, suxamethonium chloride (succinylcholine), was found to be the most hazardous agent. Drug-specific immunoglobulin E antibodies to suxamethonium chloride and other neuromuscular blockers have been demonstrated. This sensitivity to neuromuscular blockers seems to be a long-lasting phenomenon. During anaesthesia, the clinical features of an allergic reaction are often masked. Tachycardia and circulatory collapse may be the only signs of an allergic reaction, and they are easily misdiagnosed. Bronchospasm is reported to be present in about 40% of cases. Successful management of these patients includes stabilisation during the acute reaction and avoidance of future reactions. The latter is based on the identification of the causative drug and potentially cross-reacting compounds. The use of suxamethonium chloride is associated with many other adverse effects, such as fasciculations, myalgia, potassium release, changes in the heart rate, increases in intragastric and intraocular pressures, and malignant hyperthermia. Because of the dangers of hyperkalaemic cardiac arrest after suxamethonium chloride administration in children with unrecognised muscular dystrophy, there have now been moves to limit the use of this drug in children. Although neuromuscular blockers are designed to specifically block nicotinic cholinergic receptors at the neuromuscular junction, many bind to muscarinic cholinergic receptors on ganglia and smooth muscle, and alter parasympathetically mediated heart rate and airway calibre. Most benzylisoquinolinium muscle relaxants can induce histamine release, especially when they are administered rapidly, which can lead to disturbances of cardiovascular function. In addition, nondepolarising neuromuscular blockers have been implicated in causing generalised weakness following their long term administration to patients on an intensive care unit. The problem with these adverse drug reactions is their unpredictable nature. Therefore, prompt recognition with appropriate therapy can help to improve the outcome.

We report the first case of retromolar trigonum tissue injury in an 80-year-old female, caused by the Rigid GlideScope® Stylet. This complication was discovered during oral surgery.

No abstract

No abstract