Departmental sources Background: Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is used to treat retinal conditions, including retinal detachment, and involves removal of the vitreous gel from the eye. Complications following PPV include raised intraocular pressure (IOP). This retrospective study aimed to compare methods of endotamponade used during 23-gauge PPV and the risk of raised IOP during 24-month follow-up at a single center. Material/Methods: The study included 196 patients (age, 15-86 years; mean, 63.5 years) (196 eyeballs). There were 93 patients (47.45%) with a preoperative history of type 2 diabetes mellitus and 14 patients (7.14%) with a history of myopia. IOP was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry at one-, three-, six-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. The outcome was compared following endotamponade with silicone oil, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and balanced salt solution (BSS). Results: Mean IOP at one-month follow-up was 17.2 mmHg (±3.61 mmHg; range, 9-45 mmHg), and at 24-month follow-up was 17.3 mmHg (±3.23 mmHg; range, 7-30 mmHg). IOP following PPV was significantly associated with the indication for PPV (P=0.023), and the type of endotamponade used (P=0.049). In patients with silicone oil endotamponade, the risk of IOP at 24 months was increased by 2.3 times compared with SF6 or BSS endotamponade. Patients with SF6 endotamponade had a risk of IOP that was 3.3 times lower than for silicone oil tamponade or BSS tamponade. Conclusions: Silicone oil endotamponade in PPV was associated with an increased risk of IOP at 24-month follow-up.

Background & Objective: Corneal endothelial cells (ECD) are characterized by limited regenerative potential, which is additionally impaired in patients with diabetes. This retrospective study included 27 patients aged 58.1±13.6, 16 female and 11 males, who underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy in combination with cataract surgery (phacovitrectomy) and further Ex-PRESS shunt implantation throughout 2013-2017 at St. Barbara Hospital in Sosnowiec, Poland. Methods: In our study, we distinguished 4 periods: initial period; post phacovitrectomy and removal of oil tamponade; and 3 and 12 months post implantation of the Ex-PRESS shunt. Statistical analysis was performed at the level of statistical significance of p<0.05. It included an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc test in order to determine the differences in the density of ECD cells/mm2 between the periods of observation. The paired-samples t-Student test was also performed to determine whether the differences in visual acuity values before and after PPV and before and after Ex-PRESS shunt were statistically significant. Results: The initial count of ECD cells was 2381.1±249, which decreased to 1872.8±350.7 cell/mm2 and finally to 1677.9±327 at the endpoint. Differences in the density of ECD cells/mm2 were observed to be statistically significant between the periods: after PPV vs. initial number of ECD (p = 0.000138); before 3 months after Ex-PRESS shunt vs. initial number of ECD (p = 0.000138); 12 months after Ex- PRESS shunt vs. initial number of ECD (p = 0000138). Analyzing the changes in visual acuity, we observed a deterioration both before and 3 months after Ex-PRESS shunt (p = 0.007944) and before and after PPV (p = 0.060334). In turn, correlation analysis indicated that there is a statistically significant, moderate, positive relationship. The relationship between visual acuity after Ex-PRESS shunt and ECD cells/mm2 density turned out to be statistically significant (r = +0.521381; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Regardless of the period of observation and the choice of ophthalmic treatment of diabetic complications, we observed a decrease in the number of ECD cells and a deterioration in visual acuity. It is, therefore, reasonable to provide the patient with complete information about the proposed procedures and to consider the risk-benefit balance.