ublic health measures to limit the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include requirements not to leave home except for specified purposes, to work from home when practical, to limit proximity to other people, to not visit residential aged care homes, to limit the number of people at social events (weddings, funerals, celebrations), to restrict interstate and international travel, and to accept the enforcement of these restrictions. The mental health consequences of these measures are likely to be unevenly distributed across the community because they also depend on individual social and economic circumstances. A recent position paper 1 summarised international expert opinion on research priorities for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. The first recommendation was to gather high quality population level data on its mental health effects. The aim of our study was to assess the mental health of people in Australia during the first month of COVID-19-related restrictions. Our specific objectives were to estimate population prevalence rates of clinically significant symptoms of depression, generalised anxiety, thoughts of being better off dead, increased irritability, and high optimism about the future; to estimate the prevalence of direct experiences of COVID-19, loss of employment caused by COVID-19 restrictions, concern about contracting COVID-19, and major disadvantage because of the restrictions; and to assess associations between these experiences and mental health symptoms. Methods A short, anonymous survey (estimated completion time, 8 minutes) of people living in Australia and aged at least 18 years was available on the Monash University website (https:// www.monash.edu/medic ine/living-with-covid-19-restr ictio nssurvey) from 3 April 2020 (four days after national stage two COVID-19 restrictions were announced by the Prime Minister; phase one restrictions had been gradually introduced during March) until midnight on 2/3 May 2020 (further information: online Supporting Information). Mental health Psychological symptoms experienced during the preceding fortnight were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The PHQ-9 2 is an easily understood scale that asks respondents to rate their experience of nine symptoms from 0 (not experienced) to 3 (experienced nearly every day); a total PHQ-9 score of 10 or more indicates clinically significant (moderate to severe) symptoms, while scores of 5-9 indicate mild symptoms. The GAD-7 3 is an easily understood scale that asks respondents to rate their experience of seven symptoms of anxiety with the same response options as the PHQ-9; a total GAD-7 score of 10 or more indicate clinically significant (moderate to severe) symptoms, while scores of 5-9 indicate mild symptoms. Optimism about the future was assessed with a visual analogue scale (from 0, not at all optimistic, to 10, extremely optimistic).

The aim was to identify from empirical research that used quantitative or qualitative methods the reasons women give for having an abortion. A search was conducted of peer-reviewed, English language publications indexed in eight computerized databases with publication date 1996-2008, using keywords 'abortion' and 'reason' (Medline: 'induced abortion' OR 'termination of pregnancy' OR 'elective abortion' and 'reason'). Inclusion criteria were empirical research on humans that identified women's reasons for undergoing an abortion, conducted in 'high-income' countries. 19 eligible papers were found. Despite variation in methods of generating, collecting, and analysing reasons, and the inadequacy of methodological detail in some papers, all contributed to a consistent picture of the reasons women give for having an abortion, with three main categories ('Woman-focused', 'Other-focused', and 'Material') identified. Ambivalence was often evident in women's awareness of reasons for continuing the pregnancy, but abortion was chosen because continuing with the pregnancy was assessed as having adverse effects on the life of the woman and significant others. Women's reasons were complex and contingent, taking into account their own needs, a sense of responsibility to existing children and the potential child, and the contribution of significant others, including the genetic father.

Background Despite a common misconception, older adults engage in sexual behavior. However, there is limited sexual behavior research in older adults, which is often restricted to small samples, to cohorts recruiting adults from 45 years old, and to questions regarding only sexual intercourse. Aim To assess the cross-sectional prevalence of and characteristics associated with sexual activity and physical tenderness in community-dwelling older adults. Methods From the Rotterdam Study, sexual activity and physical tenderness were assessed in 2,374 dementia-free, community-dwelling men and women at least 65 years old from 2009 through 2012 in the Netherlands. Analyses were stratified by sex and partner status. Outcomes Sexual activity and physical tenderness (eg, fondling or kissing) in the last 6 months. Potential associated characteristics included measurements of demographics, socioeconomic position, health behavior, and health status. Results The vast majority of partnered participants (men, n = 858; women, n = 724) had experienced physical tenderness in the previous 6 months (83.7% of men and 82.9% of women) and nearly half had engaged in sexual activity (49.5% and 40.4% respectively). Very few unpartnered women (n = 675) had engaged in sexual activity (1.3%) or physical tenderness (5.2%), whereas prevalence rates were slightly higher for unpartnered men (n = 117; 13.7% or 17.1%). Engaging in sexual behavior was generally associated with younger age, greater social support, healthier behaviors, and better physical and psychological health. Clinical Implications Findings show that older adults engage in sexual activity. It is important not to assume that an older person is not interested in sexual pleasure or that an older person is unhappy with not having a sexual partner. Offering an opportunity for open discussion of sexuality and medical assistance without imposing is a difficult balance. We encourage health care professionals to proactively address sexuality and extend knowledge about safe sex and sexual function to older adults. Strengths and Limitations Thus far, this is one of the largest samples of sexual behavior assessment in adults older than 60 years. Limitations of this study are common in sexual behavior research, including low sexual behavior engagement among unpartnered older adults and a small sample of unpartnered men, which restricted sex- and age-specific implications. Conclusion Almost half of partnered older adults engaged in sexual activity and more than two thirds engaged in physical tenderness, but very few unpartnered older adults engaged in these behaviors. The greatest barrier to being sexually active at an older age is lack of a partner, which particularly affects women. Sexuality is an important aspect of active aging.

Not applicable.