Indonesia telah bergeser dari lingkup lokal ke lingkup global. Perubahan pada era globalisasi, memberikan tantangan tersendiri bagi masyarakat Indonesia untuk terus membuka diri dan mengikuti arus perubahan, baik dalam keadaan siap ataupun tidak. Pemerintah Indonesia melakukan serangkaian pengukuran

Previous research which found that adolescent tend to involve in radicalism make interesting to find out the relationship between identity status and religious tolerance in adolescence. This research involved 157 participants whose ages ranged from 11 to 24 years. The variable of identity status was conceptualized based on Erikson’s exploration and commitment aspects, and was measured using Ego Identity Process Questionnaire (EIPQ). Meanwhile, religious tolerance was measured using a rating scale adapted from van der Walt’s religious tolerance scale. This study found negative relationship between commitment and religious tolerance, and there is no a relationship between exploration and religious tolerance. From four identity status tested, it is found that most participants are in the category of identity diffusion which means that most participants have no specific commitment and interest in ideology. The result also shows that identity moratorium has the highest mean in religious tolerance, and it is found significantly different with identity achievement and identity foreclosure. Based on the commitment aspect, participants with achievement and foreclosure identity status tend to be religiously intolerance, while those with identity moratorium are found most open to the others’ worldviews.Keywords: Identity status, religious tolerance, adolescentAbstrak: Adanya survei yang menunjukkan besarnya kecenderungan remaja untuk melakukan tindakan radikalisme melandasi dilakukannya penelitian ini yang bertujuan untuk melihat korelasi antara status identitas dan toleransi beragama pada remaja. Responden pada penelitian ini sebanyak 157 remaja dengan rentang usia 11-24 tahun, yang dimasukkan dalam 4 kategori status identitas. Status identitas diukur dengan menggunakan dua kriteria utama pembentukan identitas dari Erikson, yaitu exploration dan commitment, serta diukur menggunakan skala Ego Identity Process Questionnaire (EIPQ). Toleransi beragama diukur menggunakan skala toleransi agama yang diadaptasi dari skala yang disusun van der Walt. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan negatif antara dimensi komitmen dengan toleransi beragama, sedangkan dimensi eksplorasi dengan toleransi beragama tidak terbukti berhubungan.  Hasil uji terhadap 4 kategori status identitas menunjukkan bahwa  sebagian besar partisipan berada dalam kategori identitas diffusion yang berarti tidak memiliki komitmen ideologis. Selain itu, identity moratorium memiliki rerata yang paling tinggi dalam toleransi beragama dan berbeda signifikan dengan identity achievement dan identity foreclosure. Berdasarkan pada tingginya dimensi komitmen dan karakteristik masing-masing kategori status identitas, identity achieve-ment dan identity foreclosure merupakan kategori yang memiliki kecenderungan untuk bersikap intoleran, sedangkan identity moratorium masih memiliki keterbukaan terhadap perbedaan agama atau ideologi.

ABSTRAK Fenomena kasus self harm semakin meningkat setiap tahunnya, terutama pada kelompok remaja dan dewasa awal. Kurangnya informasi yang akurat mengenai self harm membuat banyak individu tidak menyadari bahwa perilaku self harm bisa mengarah kepada gangguan psikologis Non-Suicidal Self Injury (NSSI) yang dapat mengganggu fungsi sosial seseorang dan akhirnya memperburuk kualitas hidupnya. Pandangan yang tidak tepat dari lingkungan sekitar juga bisa membuat individu kehilangan kesempatan memperoleh dukungan untuk sembuh dan bahkan bisa mengarah pada kematian. Oleh karena diperlukan psikoedukasi untuk membangun awareness terhadap perilaku self harm. Agar materi psikoedukasi bisa tepat guna dan sasaran, maka dipandang perlu adanya preliminary research, untuk memperoleh pondasi data yang akurat. Oleh karena itu kegiatan dibagi menjadi 3 tahap:  Pertama adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan metode wawancara dan observasi terhadap 5 partisipan. Tahap kedua adalah studi kasus dari para klien konseling, Tahap ketiga adalah  penyusunan materi psikoedukasi. Hasilnya  adalah banyak peserta yang berminat mengikuti psikoedukasi secara online, dan materi psikoedukasi yang telah diunggah di YouTube sudah memiliki banyak viewer. ABSTRACT The self-harm phenomenon has been increasing every year, especially in adolescence and young adults. Lack of accurate information about self-harm makes many individuals not realize that self-harm can led to a psychological disorder, called Non – Suicidal Self Injury (NSSI). NSSI interferes an individual's social function and eventually worsened an individual’s quality of life. Misjudgments from others for self-harm behavior can cause client or patient lose their opportunity to get professional help and in the worst-case scenario can lead them to death. Therefore, psychoeducation is needed to spread awareness about this phenomenon. Before developing psychoeducation materials, it is important to first have some preliminary research, to gather a valid data base. Therefore, the activities are divided into 3 stages: The first is a qualitative research, in this activity researcher interviewing and observing 5 participants with self-harm behavior. Second researchers did counselling and review cases from clients with the same problems. Third is the preparation of psychoeducation material. As a result, many people were interested in participating self harm psychoeducation webinar, and there are a lot of viewers that watch this activity in YouTube.

GESI (Gender Equality and Social Inclusion) is one of the important issues of the world’s concern. For instance, based on UN data, it is estimated that 70% of women are the poorest group in the world. In addition, family head women (the backbone of the family), poor women, the elderly people, people with disabilities, children, minority groups, indigenous peoples, laborers, domestic servants, disaster victims, and other marginalized groups in the frontier, outermost, and isolated regions are still excluded from many university research programs in Indonesia. Therefore, universities need to be encouraged to focus their research activities on GESI. This research was aimed at developing an outcome-based instrument for assessing the performance of university research with a GESI perspective. To achieve this objective, the research method used was instrument development, including three stages, namely preliminary stage (theoretical review), product development stage (theoretical test), and product implementation stage (instrument test). Expert judgment (Borg & Gall, 2003) was employed for the content validity test and Principal Component Analysis (Rigner, 2008) was adopted for the data analysis. The outcome of the research was an Outcome-based Instrument for Assessing the Performance of University Research with a GESI perspective. The result of the research has an implication for the need to improve the quality of research focusing on GESI for lecturers.