Immunoglobulin A (IgA) vasculitis or Henoch–Schönlein purpura is a predominantly pediatric disease occurring after a triggering viral or bacterial infection. Conversely, drug exposure is the most common inciting event in adult cases of IgA vasculitis. Recently, data has suggested a temporal association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and the development of IgA vasculitis in children and adults. Here, we describe a case of IgA vasculitis with nephritis in a 70‐year‐old man with COVID‐19 and perform a comprehensive review of eight reported cases of suspected COVID‐19‐associated IgA vasculitis. When compared to classical IgA vasculitis, COVID‐19‐associated IgA vasculitis exclusively affects males ( p < 0.00002) and is more common in adults ( p < 0.005). Among cases of COVID‐19‐associated IgA vasculitis, adult cases were associated with significantly more arthralgia than pediatric cases ( p = 0.04). In cases where skin biopsy was obtained, direct immunofluorescence (DIF) was negative for IgA in 50% of cases; thereafter, kidney biopsy DIF was positive for IgA in all cases. With this study, we provide support for an association between IgA vasculitis and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and provide clinical information differentiating its manifestations from classical IgA vasculitis.
Background In recent years, an association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and bullous pemphigoid has been detected in pharmacovigilance studies in European and Asian countries; however, no pharmacovigilance data have been published yet in the USA. Objective The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between bullous pemphigoid and DPP-4 inhibitors and other oral diabetes mellitus medications in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods Case/non-case analyses were performed in the FAERS using data from 2006 to 2020 to examine the reporting odds ratio (ROR) signal for bullous pemphigoid for all classes of oral diabetes medications. These analyses were performed under multiple conditions to control for bias: (1) comparison to all other drugs in the FAERS; (2) comparison to other diabetes medications; and (3) comparison to all other diabetes medications where only a single agent was implicated. Results A statistically significant ROR for bullous pemphigoid was found for DPP-4 inhibitors under all conditions: (1) 109.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 101.61-118.62); (2) 74.46 (95% CI 60.58-91.52); and (3) . A larger signal was seen for non-US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved (anagliptin, vildagliptin, teneligliptin) vs FDA-approved DPP-4 inhibitors (alogliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin), likely because of an overestimation of the ROR for non-FDA-approved drugs. The largest signal was seen under conditions 1 and 2 with vildagliptin (1) 1022.83 (95%
Squamous cell carcinoma of the nail unit (SCCNU) is a rare neoplastic condition that involves multiple digits (polydactylous SCCNU) in only 3.9% of cases. Here, we report a case of polydactylous SCCNU and perform a comprehensive review of MEDLINE and Embase to collate 44 cases of polydactylous SCCNU reported to date. Polydactylous patients were younger on average (48 to 61-63 years) and had a longer diagnostic delay (44 vs 35.1 months) compared with reported monodactylous cases. Human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity was observed in 49% of cases, and the most common serotypes noted were 16 (25.8%), 73 (16.1%), 58 (9.7%), 18 (6.5%), and 33 (6.5%). Twenty percent of the cases were in immunosuppressed individuals who had a statistically significant lower age at diagnosis (39.33 years vs 51.12 years; P = .01) and diagnostic delay (2.50 months vs 132.46 months, P = .04). Patients with HPV positivity had a lower age at diagnosis (43.74 years vs 53.29 years, P = .04). Environmental exposures noted to be associated with polydactylous disease included X-rays, paint/solvents, soluble oils, and stagnant water. This comprehensive literature review serves to characterize polydactylous SCCNU and distinguish the differences in its characteristics to improve diagnosis and clinical recognition.
Background/objective The association between antiglaucoma medications and the development of ocular pseudopemphigoid (OPP) has been described; however, the independent risk of each medication has not been quantified. Methods Case/non‐case analyses were performed in the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) using data from 2010–2020 to examine the reporting odds ratio (ROR) signal for OPP for all classes of antiglaucoma medications under multiple conditions: (i) comparison to all other drugs in FAERs, (ii) comparison to other antiglaucoma medications, (iii) comparison to vehicle/hydrating eye drops with cases of OPP and (iv) comparison to vehicle/hydrating eyedrops with and without cases of OPP to control for topical irritant and preservative effects. Results A statistically significant ROR for OPP was found for aggregate antiglaucoma medications under the first condition but not the third or fourth (i.96.97 (95% CI 52.54–178.98). The largest signal for OPP when compared to other glaucoma drugs and eye drops was seen with unoprostone (ii.68.96 (95% CI 8.35–569.50, iii.39.85 (95% CI 4.14–383.33), iv.581.67 (95% CI 49.38–6851.57) followed by carteolol (ii.32.51(95% CI 9.02–117.67), iii.10.67 (95% CI 1.77–64.13), iv.77.84 (95% CI 12.95–467.78) and betaxolol (ii.23.38 (95% CI 7.28–74.46), iii.6.94 (95% CI 1.27–38.01), iv.50.67 (95% CI 9.26–277.25). A statistically significant ROR was noted only for the beta‐blockers class aggregate under conditions ii and iv. Conclusions Our findings support an association between OPP and antiglaucoma medications; under the most stringent control for topical irritant/preservative effect by of comparison to topical eye drops, unoprostone, carteolol, betaxolol and timolol all had a significant ROR for OPP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.