Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the implementation of rapidly changing protocols and guidelines related to the indications and perioperative precautions and protocols for tracheostomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current guidelines for tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide a framework for health systems to prepare as the science evolves over the upcoming months and years.Methods: Literature review was performed. Articles reporting clinical practice guidelines for tracheostomy in the context of COVID-19 were included.Results: A total of 13 tracheotomy guidelines were identified. Two were available via PubMed, five in society or organization websites, and six identified via health system websites or other sources. Five were from Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery specialties, six from Anesthesiology and one from Pulmonary/Critical Care. All (100%) studies recommended postponing elective OR cases in COVID-19 positive patients, while seven recommended reducing team members to only essential staff and three recommended forming a designated tracheostomy team. Recommendations with supporting references are summarized in the article. Conclusions: Tracheostomy guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic vary by physician groups and specialty, hospital systems, and supply-chain/resource availability. This summary is provided as a point-in-time current state of the guidelines for tracheotomy management in April 2020 and is expected to change in coming weeks and months as the COVID-19 pandemic, virus testing and antibody testing evolves. K E Y W O R D S

No abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to describe and compare how postoperative complications after oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) surgery are reported in medical records, institutional billing claims, and national clinical registries. Methods The medical records of 355 previously untreated patients who underwent surgery for oral cavity SCC at our institution were retrospectively reviewed for postoperative complications. Information was compared with claims and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data. Results We identified 219 patients (62%) experiencing 544 complications (10% major). Billing claims identified 29% of these patients, 36% of overall complications, and 98% of major complications. Of overlapping patients, NSQIP identified 27% of patients, 33% of overall complications, and 100% of major complications noted on chart abstraction. Conclusion The incidence of minor postoperative complications after oral cavity SCC surgery is relatively high. Both claims data and NSQIP accurately recorded major complications, but were suboptimal compared to chart abstraction in capturing minor complications.

No abstract

Background Whether elective lymph neck dissection (ELND) is associated with improved survival in oral squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the maxillary alveolus/hard palate is not known. Methods One hundred ninety-nine patients presenting de novo and receiving treatment for clinically node negative SCC of the maxillary alveolus/hard palate at 2 cancer centers between 1985 and 2011 were analyzed. Results Forty-two patients (21%) received ELND. Occult nodal metastases were present in 29% of the dissected necks. The ELND group had more T3 to T4 status tumors (62% vs 34%; p < .001) and positive-margin resections (59% vs 38%; p = .019). Patients undergoing ELND experienced lower rates of neck recurrence (6% vs 21%; p = .031), superior 5-year recurrence-free survival (68% vs 45%; p = .026), and overall survival (86% vs 62%; p = .043). ELND was associated with a 2-fold decrease in risk of recurrence in multivariable analysis. Conclusion ELND was associated with lower rates of recurrence and improved survival in SCC of the maxillary alveolus/hard palate.