BACKGROUND:Blasts incidents impose catastrophic aftermaths on populations regarding casualties, sustained injuries, and devastated infrastructure. Lebanon witnessed one of the largest nonnuclear chemical explosions in modern history-the August 2020 Beirut Port blast. This study assesses the mechanisms and characteristics of blast morbidity and mortality and examines severe injury predictors through the Injury Severity Score. METHODS:A retrospective, multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted. Data of trauma patients presenting to five major acute-care hospitals in metropolitan Beirut up to 4 days following the blast were collected in a two-stage process from patient hospital chart review and follow-up phone calls. RESULTS:A total of 791 patients with a mean age of 42 years were included. The mean distance from the blast was 2.4 km (SD, 1.9 km); 3.1% of victims were in the Beirut Port itself. The predominant mechanism of injury was being struck by an object (falling/projectile) (293 [37.0%]), and the most frequent site of injury was the head/face (209 [26.4%]). Injury severity was low for 548 patients (71.2%), moderate for 62 (8.1%), and severe/critical for 27 (3.5%). Twenty-one deaths (2.7%) were recorded. Significant serious injury predictors (Injury Severity Score, >15) were sustaining multiple injuries (odds ratio [OR], 2.62; p = 0.005); a fracture (OR, 5.78; p < 0.001); primary blast injuries, specifically a blast lung (OR, 18.82; p = 0.001), concussion (OR, 7.17; p < 0.001), and eye injury (OR, 8.51; p < 0.001); and secondary blast injuries, particularly penetrating injuries (OR, 9.93; p < 0.001) and traumatic amputations (OR, 13.49; p = 0.01). Twenty-five percent were admitted to the hospital, with 4.6% requiring the intensive care unit. At discharge, 25 patients (3.4%) had recorded neurologic disability. CONCLUSION:Most injuries sustained by the blast victims were minor. Serious injuries were mostly linked to blast overpressure and projectile fragments. Understanding blast injuries characteristics, their severity, and management is vital to informing emergency services, disaster management strategies, hospital preparedness, and, consequently, improving patient outcomes.

Objectives: In December 2019, an invasive viral outbreak, the Corona Virus Disease 19 spread to the whole world. An international cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate how healthcare workers in Emergency departments dealt with this pandemic.Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 180 healthcare workers around the world during May and June of the year 2020.Results: A total of 134 HCW from 23 countries responded with a majority of Emergency physicians (36.8%). The PCR testing is available in 72.9% of the hospitals. Different architectural strategies were used to isolate suspected cases in the Emergency department (ED). Half of the institutions would not allow visitors, while the other half, restricted visiting hours and the number of visitors. Triage for suspected patients relied in 82.8% on symptoms. Almost 98% of HCW used a combination of mask, gloves, gown and face shield. Around 65% of the HCW have a tendency to discharge more patients from the ED than what they were used to.Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic made a major change within the emergency departments worldwide.

The population around the world is growing in age, and taking care of the elderly has become a medical challenge as new pathologies, risk factors, treatments, and approaches are being explored. One of the most important chapters that should be focused on is falls in the elderly, as it is a common reason for, not only fractures but also dependency, morbidity, and mortality in this population. The chapter on fall is vast and can be further categorized. In this article, we aim to focus on one of the complications, which is discitis post-vertebral fracture. The patient studied was a 78-year-old female patient who consulted post-fall and was admitted to the geriatric ward for a vertebral fracture. The hospitalization was complicated by a spinal infection and later on by a rarely-seen pacemaker lead infection. Vertebral fractures are very common in the geriatric population, whether spontaneously or post-trauma. Although treatment can be surgical or conservative, complications are commonly seen and can be fatal. Discitis is a medical challenge as the germs can be difficult to isolate, the pain management is difficult and in frail elderly patients, the infection and inflammation can be fatal. Prevention of falls is important in the elderly population as a simple slip can have drastic outcomes. Understanding the possible complications of falls is essential for better management.

No abstract

Patient: Male, 75-year-old Final Diagnosis: Delayed IV contrast allergic reaction Symptoms: Rash Medication:— Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Dermatology Objective: Rare co-existance of disease or pathology Background: Iodine contrast allergy can cause acute and delayed allergic reactions. Just like any other sensitivity reaction, the severity can vary from mild to moderate skin manifestations such as erythematous rash to an even more severe presentation or life-threatening event, such as angioedema and anaphylaxis. Case Report: This case report discusses a patient who presented to our institution with a diffuse complex rash 2 days after undergoing CT scan imaging with intravenous iodine contrast injection. The rash started by being maculopapular in nature. Later on, the patient developed a purpuric and petechial pattern, and eventually, an acute exanthematous pustulosis rash was noticed. Several attempts to treat the patient with intravenous corticosteroids failed. Three days after admission (5 days after the rash started), topical steroids were used in place of parenteral steroids. The rash showed remarkable improvement in a very short time. The patient was diagnosed with delayed hypersensitivity IV iodine reaction, resistant to parenteral corticosteroids. The workup of such an extensive rash and odd presentation include several laboratory tests and skin testing to be able to rule out more serious differential diagnoses. Conclusions: This case is unique as it enables us to show the importance of substituting topical management, more specifically, topical steroids that might even replace parenteral steroids, to our management in order to treat allergic reactions, especially in the presence of a rash.