There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.

Objective COVID‐19 is a novel infectious disease with a broad spectrum of clinical severity. Patients with systemic vasculitis have an increased risk of serious infections and may be at risk of severe outcomes following COVID‐19. We undertook this study to establish the risk factors for severe COVID‐19 outcomes in these patients, including the impact of immunosuppressive therapies. Methods A multicenter cohort was developed through the participation of centers affiliated with national UK and Ireland vasculitis registries. Clinical characteristics and outcomes are described. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between potential risk factors and a severe COVID‐19 outcome, defined as a requirement for advanced oxygen therapy, a requirement for invasive ventilation, or death. Results The cohort included 65 patients with systemic vasculitis who developed COVID‐19 (median age 70 years, 49% women), of whom 25 patients (38%) experienced a severe outcome. Most patients (55 of 65 [85%]) had antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV). Almost all patients required hospitalization (59 of 65 [91%]), 7 patients (11%) were admitted to intensive care, and 18 patients (28%) died. Background glucocorticoid therapy was associated with severe outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.7 [95% confidence interval 1.1–14.9]; P = 0.047), as was comorbid respiratory disease (adjusted OR 7.5 [95% confidence interval 1.9–38.2]; P = 0.006). Vasculitis disease activity and nonglucocorticoid immunosuppressive therapy were not associated with severe outcomes. Conclusion In patients with systemic vasculitis, glucocorticoid use at presentation and comorbid respiratory disease were associated with severe outcomes in COVID‐19. These data can inform clinical decision‐making relating to the risk of severe COVID‐19 in this vulnerable patient group.

No abstract

Objectives High dose glucocorticoids anchor standard care in giant cell arteritis (GCA) but are associated with significant toxicity. We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a stratified approach to glucocorticoid tapering. The strategy aggressively reduced glucocorticoid doses in those manifesting an adequate early response to treatment with view to minimising glucocorticoid complications. Methods A retrospective, population-based study of GCA was performed. All cases were confirmed by temporal artery biopsy between November 2010 and November 2015. Baseline and outcome data were extracted from secondary and primary care records at diagnosis and 1 year. The primary outcome was loss of vision. Secondary outcomes included remission and relapse rates as well as corticosteroid related complications. Results The cohort consisted of 73 patients (76% female; mean age 73.5, SD 7.6). At presentation reduction in visual acuity (VA) was recorded in n = 17 (22.3%). Median CRP at diagnosis was 69.5mg/L (IQR 40.5-101mg/L) with median ESR 80mm/h (IQR 60-91mm/hr). At 1 year, remission was achieved in n = 64 (87.7%) and n = 10 (13.7%) relapsed. A single patient sustained visual loss following initiation of therapy. Median CRP at 1 year was 4mg/L (IQR 4-9.5mg/L) and mean Prednisolone dose was 5.4mg (0-15mg). Steroid related complications were observed in n = 10(13.7%). Conclusion A stratified approach to corticosteroid tapering appeared safe and effective in GCA. It was associated with high rate of remission and promisingly low rates of relapse following 1 year follow up. This real-world data indicates glucocorticoid exposure can be safely minimised in some patients with GCA.

Objectives GCA patients with large vessel involvement (LV-GCA) experience greater CS requirements and higher relapse rates compared with classical cranial GCA. Despite the distinct disease course, interventions in LV-GCA have yet to be investigated specifically. This study aimed to evaluate the CS-sparing effect and tolerability of first-line mycophenolate in LV-GCA. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with LV-GCA identified from a regional clinical database between 2005 and 2019. All cases were prescribed mycophenolate derivatives (MYC; MMF or mycophenolic acid) at diagnosis and were followed up for ≥2 years. The primary outcome was the cumulative CS dose at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included MYC tolerance, relapse rates and CRP levels at 1 and 2 years. Results A total of 37 patients (65% female; mean age 69.4 years, SD 7.9 years) were identified. All cases demonstrated large vessel involvement via CT/PET (n = 34), CT angiography (n = 5) or magnetic resonance angiography (n = 2). After 2 years, 31 patients remained on MYC, whereas 6 had switched to MTX or tocilizumab owing to significant disease relapse. The mean (±SD) cumulative prednisolone dose at 1 year was 4960 (±1621) mg. Relapse rates at 1 and 2 years were 16.2 and 27%, respectively, and CRP levels at 1 and 2 years were 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 4–6] and 4 (IQR 4–4) mg/l, respectively. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to assess the effectiveness of any specific agent in LV-GCA. MYC might be both effective in reducing CS exposure and well tolerated in this subpopulation. A future randomized controlled trial is warranted.