Medical students have generally positive attitudes towards science and scientific research in medicine. Attendance of a course on research methodology is related to a positive attitude towards science.
Academic misconduct is widespread among medical students at the largest medical school in Croatia and its prevalence is greater than that reported for developed countries. This may be related to social and cultural factors specific to a country in the midst of a post-communist transition to a market economy, and calls for measures to be instigated at an institutional level to educate against and prevent such behaviour.
Resting (CD38 low ) tonsillar B cells differentiate to express the centroblast-restricted CD77/ globotriaosylceramide antigen on high-level engagement of CD154. As the CD38 low population comprises both naive and memory subsets, we wished to compare the propensity of each to develop this germinal center phenotype; particularly as the capacity of memory B cells to re-enter a follicular reaction remains unclear. Resting B lymphocytes were therefore separated into CD27 -IgA -IgG -and IgD -fractions to generate subsets enriched for naive and memory cells, respectively. Following stimulation via BCR and/or CD40 -surrogate signals for B cells engaged in T-dependent signaling -differences between the two subsets were seen in the kinetics and/or magnitude of responses such as entry into DNA synthesis, induction of the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86; up-regulation of CD23, and changes in BCL-6 mRNA expression. Nevertheless, naive and memory cells revealed a nigh identical capacity for acquiring CD77: both appeared equally sensitive in this regard, with high-level CD40 engagement via cell-bound CD154 being required for both subsets to achieve the hallmark centroblast phenotype. These findings suggest that, provided with the opportunity to encounter cell membrane CD154 in abundance, both naive and memory B cells display the potential to be diverted towards a germinal center pathway of differentiation.
This study tried to investigate the impact of oXiris filter on both clinical and laboratory parameters in critically‐ill COVID‐19 intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving extracorporeal blood purification and the clinical setting for the initiation of therapy. A consecutive sample of 15 ICU patients with COVID‐19 was treated with oXiris membrane for blood purification or for support of renal function due to acute kidney injury. We have included 19 non treated ICU COVID‐19 patients as a control group. Two chest x‐rays were analyzed for determining the chest x‐ray severity score. We have found a significant decrease of SOFA score, respiratory status improved and the chest x‐ray severity score was significantly decreased after 72 h of treatment. IL‐6 significantly decreased after 72 h of treatment while other inflammatory markers did not. Respiratory status in the control group worsened as well as increase in SOFA score and chest x‐ray severity score. Survived patients have shorter time from the onset of symptoms before starting with extracorporeal blood purification treatment and shorter time on vasoactive therapy and invasive respiratory support than deceased patients. Critically‐ill patients with COVID‐19 treated with extracorporeal blood purification survived significantly longer than other ICU COVID‐19 patients. Treatment with oXiris membrane provides significant reduction of IL‐6, leads to improvement in respiratory status, chest x‐ray severity score, and reduction of SOFA score severity. Our results can suggest that ICU COVID‐19 patients in an early course of a disease could be potentially a target group for earlier initiation of extracorporeal blood purification.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.