The study of the socio-cultural specifics of subjective well-being, its determinants and resources are an important task of modern psychology. The authors present the results of an empirical study, the purpose of which is to identify the features of the relationship between conscious self-regulation and tolerance for uncertainty and subjective well-being in young people of different ethnic groups. The study involved 1435 respondents aged 18-35 from five regions of Russia (Karachay-Cherkess Republic, Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, Republic of North Ossetia - Alania, Stavropol Territory, Moscow and the Moscow Region), belonging to the dominant ethnic groups in them. The design of the empirical study included an assessment of differences in indicators of subjective well-being, tolerance or intolerance for uncertainty and conscious self-regulation among various representatives of ethnocultural groups, as well as an analysis of the relationship between these indicators, in particular, using structural modeling. The results obtained confirm the influence of the cultural context of income on the level of subjective well-being. Less prosperous, as they consider themselves, are young people from ethnic groups where the socio-economic situation of the region does not provide opportunities for self-realization of the individual. The study has revealed two types of regulatory profiles: (1) a profile with a harmonious structure with a relatively pronounced general level of self-regulation, which is observed among the Russian respondents from Moscow and the Moscow region; and (2) a relatively accentuated profile, characteristic of Karachays, Circassians, Ossetians, and Russians (from the Stavropol Territory), expressed in the desire for a clear programming of their actions, their compliance with certain norms. It has been established that young people from the southern republics are less tolerant of uncertainty: they tend to solve problems in a situation of uncertainty in a ‘ready-made’ algorithm determined by traditions. Finally, the authors reveal the structure of relationships between the predictors of subjective well-being, which are presented in the form of models. The central place in these models belongs to conscious self-regulation and its basic cognitive-regulatory processes and personal-regulatory properties, which, both directly and indirectly, due to the mediator role of tolerance or intolerance for uncertainty, affect the subjective well-being of young people. The results of the study contribute to a deeper understanding of the ethno-regional specificity of the predictors of the subjective well-being of today’s youth and can serve as a basis for assisting in constructing interaction with representatives of other cultures and developing strategies for actively overcoming difficulties in a situation of uncertainty.
The subjective well-being problem in the context of the influence of uncertainty, the personal dispositions leading role and regulatory resources of modern youth is becoming an extremely significant task and a global challenge of modern society. The purpose of this study was to identify significant predictors of the subjective well-being of young people of different age groups. At the first stage, a comparative analysis of well-being predictors was carried out. The study involved 1435 respondents aged 18 to 35 years. The average age is 20.7. The study used: a Shamionov’s and Beskova’s method for diagnosing the subjective well-being of the personality; Morosanova’s “Self-regulation Profile Questionnaire - SRPQM 2020”; tolerance / intolerance to uncertainty questionnaire by Kornilova and Chumakova; short version of the Big Five Personality Questionnaire, MiniIPIP. For data analysis, one-way analysis of variance, regression analysis, and Student’s t-test were used. At the second stage, regression models of subjective well-being were built for four age groups and their comparative analysis was carried out. Subjective well-being, social-normative well-being, and uncertainty tolerance decrease between 16 and 24 years of age and rise again for the 25-35 age group (p<0.01), except for uncertainty tolerance, which remains at the level of 22-24 age group (p<0.0001). The universal predictors of subjective well-being according to the results of regression analysis were persistence β = [0,278; 0,505] and neuroticism β = [-0,318; -0,197]. With age, the structure of regression models becomes simpler: from 7 parameters for subjects aged 16-18 (R2 = 0.57) to three parameters for the sample of 25-35 (R2 = 0.58). The results obtained can be used in educational work with young people to create psychological conditions for a conscious active attitude to the surrounding reality through the development of the ability to consciously regulate one’s activities and behavior and develop a tolerance for uncertainty
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.