Iodine and methylene blue adsorption properties of the high surface area nanoporous carbon materials derived from agro-waste and rice husk is reported. Rice husk was pre-carbonized at 300 °C in air followed by leaching out the silica nanoparticles by extraction with sodium hydroxide solution. The silica-free rice husk char was mixed with chemical activating agents sodium hydroxide (NaOH), zinc chloride (ZnCl2), and potassium hydroxide (KOH) separately at a mixing ratio of 1:1 (wt%) and carbonized at 900 °C under a constant flow of nitrogen. The prepared carbon materials were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transformed-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD), and Raman scattering. Due to the presence of bimodal micro- and mesopore structures, KOH activated samples showed high specific surface area ca. 2342 m2/g and large pore volume ca. 2.94 cm3/g. Oxygenated surface functional groups (hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl) were commonly observed in all of the samples and were essentially non-crystalline porous particle size of different sizes (<200 μm). Adsorption study revealed that KOH activated samples could be excellent material for the iodine and methylene blue adsorption from aqueous phase. Iodine and methylene blue number were ca. 1726 mg/g and 608 mg/g, respectively. The observed excellent iodine and methylene blue adsorption properties can be attributed to the well-developed micro- and mesopore structure in the carbon material. This study demonstrates that the agricultural waste, rice husk, and derived nanoporous carbon materials would be excellent adsorbent materials in water purifications.

The 1:1 balance between the numbers of large and small ribosomal subunits can be disturbed by mutations that inhibit the assembly of only one of the subunits. Here, we have investigated if the cell can counteract an imbalance of the number of the two subunits. We show that abrogating 60S assembly blocks 40S subunit accumulation. In contrast, cessation of the 40S pathways does not prevent 60S accumulation, but does, however, lead to fragmentation of the 25S rRNA in 60S subunits and formation of a 55S ribosomal particle derived from the 60S. We also present evidence suggesting that these events occur post assembly and discuss the possibility that the turnover of subunits is due to vulnerability of free subunits not paired with the other subunit to form 80S ribosomes.

Cell stress caused by repression of 54 individual ribosomal genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is analyzed. Cell cycle progression and cell morphology responses are specific to the protein whose synthesis is repressed but bud site selection is not. Proteins that generate G2/M and G1 phenotypes map to separate areas of the ribosomal particle.

The 1:1 balance between the numbers of large and small ribosomal subunits can be disturbed by mutations that inhibit the assembly of one of the subunits. We have investigated if the cell has mechanisms to counteract an imbalance of subunits. We show that accumulation of 40S subunits stops after abrogating 60S assembly. In contrast, cessation of the 40S pathways does not prevent 60S accumulation, but does, however, lead to fragmentation of the 25S rRNA in 60S subunits. Even though 40S subunits do not accumulate in the absence of 60S assembly, 40S assembly continues, indicating that excess 40S is degraded after assembly. Thus, the cell expends substantial resources in a futile attempt to increase the number of functional 80S ribosomes. We propose that a mechanism for preventing the accumulation of 40S subunits in excess over 60S subunits may have evolved to prevent mRNAs from being tied up in 40S-mRNA translation initiation complexes that cannot be turned into productive translation complexes because of the deficit of 60S subunits.All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

See original article: The small and large ribosomal subunits depend on each other for stability and accumulation, 2(2), 2019. Following publication, the authors noted that Table S1 was missing from the published version of the article, a mistake introduced during production. We apologize to our readers for this error. The HTML version of the article has been corrected and the table is given below. Table S1 Strains used.