Palabras clave: Investigación cualitativa Artículo científico Método Validez Keywords: Qualitative research Scientific article Method Validity R E S U M E NLa explotación y difusión de los datos de las investigaciones cualitativas o mixtas en el área de psicología y otras disciplinas se ven frecuentemente limitadas por la dificultad de sistematizar la información obtenida en forma de documentos científicos. En este artículo se exponen algunos consejos y recomendaciones para poder organizar la información cualitativa y redactar con rigor un artículo científico. Se presentan los criterios relacionados con la calidad, las normas de publicación y la organización específica de los distintos contenidos con el objetivo de ofrecer un esquema que pueda servir de referencia a otros investigadores para publicar sus trabajos. A B S T R A C TExploitation and dissemination of qualitative or mixed research data in the area of Psychology and other disciplines are frequently limited by the difficulty of systematizing the information obtained in the form of scientific papers. This article offers some suggestions and tips about how to organize qualitative information and write a scientific paper rigorously. Criteria related to quality standards, submission rules and the specific organization of different contents are presented in order to provide a framework that can serve as reference for other researchers to publish their own work. *

El caso español y sus implicaciones para el estudio de la ultraderecha: antecedentes y nuevas estrategias de investigación.

The aim of this research is to examine to what extent the electoral support for radical right parties (RRPs) is driven by ‘policy voting’ and to compare this support with that of centre-right parties. Using the European Election Study 2019, we focus on six party systems: Spain, Italy, France, Germany, Austria, and the United Kingdom. Our analyses reveal that party preferences for RRPs are better explained by policy considerations than by other alternative explanations (e.g. by ‘globalization losers’ or ‘protest voting’). Additionally, the results show that although preferences for both party families are mainly rooted in ‘policy voting’, notable differences emerge when looking at the role of specific policy dimensions. Overall, these findings suggest that the support for RRPs cannot be understood fundamentally as a mere reaction against economic pauperization or political dissatisfaction but instead as an ideological decision based on rational choice models.

No abstract

No abstract