Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare disease of controversial origin recently recognized as a neoplasm deriving from plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). Nevertheless, it remains an orphan tumor with obscure biology and dismal prognosis. To better understand the pathobiology of BPDCN and discover new targets for effective therapies, the gene expression profile (GEP) of 25 BPDCN samples was analyzed and compared with that of pDCs, their postulated normal counterpart. Validation was performed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), whereas functional experiments were carried out ex vivo. For the first time at the molecular level, we definitely recognized the cellular derivation of BPDCN that proved to originate from the myeloid lineage and in particular, from resting pDCs. Furthermore, thanks to an integrated bioinformatic approach we discovered aberrant activation of the NF-kB pathway and suggested it as a novel therapeutic target. We tested the efficacy of anti-NF-kB-treatment on the BPDCN cell line CAL-1, and successfully demonstrated by GEP and IHC the molecular shutoff of the NF-kB pathway. In conclusion, we identified a molecular signature representative of the transcriptional abnormalities of BPDCN and developed a cellular model proposing a novel therapeutic approach in the setting of this otherwise incurable disease.

Deregulated activity of BCR-ABL1, a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase encoded by the fusion gene resulting from the t(9;22)(q34;q11) chromosomal translocation, is thought to be the driver event responsible for initiation and maintenance of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). BCR-ABL1 was one of the first tyrosine kinases to be implicated in a human malignancy and the first to be successfully targeted. Imatinib mesylate, the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to be approved for therapeutic use, was hailed as a magic bullet against cancer and remains one of the safest and most effective anticancer agents ever developed. Second- and third-generation TKIs were later introduced to prevent or counteract the problem of drug resistance, that may arise in a small proportion of patients. They are more potent molecules, but have been associated to more serious side effects and complications. Patients achieving stable optimal responses to TKI therapy are predicted to have the same life expectancy of the general population. However, TKIs do not ‘cure’ CML. Only a small proportion of cases may attempt therapy discontinuation without experiencing subsequent relapse. The great majority of patients will have to assume TKIs indefinitely – which raises serious pharmacoeconomic concerns and is now shifting the focus from efficacy to compliance and quality of life issues. Here we retrace the steps that have led from the biological acquisitions regarding BCR-ABL1 structure and function to the development of inhibitory strategies and we discuss drug resistance mechanism and how they can be addressed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12943-018-0780-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

Optimal use of current therapeutic opportunities for chronic myeloid leukemia patients requires integration of clinical and laboratory monitoring. Assessment of molecular response (MR) by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most sensitive way to monitor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment efficacy. Besides major molecular response, which has emerged as a safe haven for survival since the initial studies of first-line imatinib treatment, two additional MR milestones have recently been defined: early molecular response and deep molecular response. The achievement of such MR milestones within defined time points during therapy is thought to draw the ideal trajectory toward optimal longterm outcome and, possibly, successful treatment discontinuation. Sensitive and reproducible MR measurement and proper interpretation of MR results are therefore critical to correctly inform therapeutic decisions. In patients who do not achieve an optimal response to TKI therapy, BCR-ABL1 mutation screening should also be performed, because it may deliver useful information for TKI choice. This review aims to help clinicians apply and translate the latest response definitions and clinical recommendations into practice. We provide a critical update on how these recommendations have incorporated MR levels in the clinical decision algorithms and how detection of BCR-ABL1 mutations should be interpreted. We also include a practical guide for pathologists and molecular biologists to best perform molecular testing and for hematologists and oncologists to best integrate it into routine practice. The Oncologist 2016;21:626-633Implications for Practice: Ever-more-potent therapeutic strategies have been developed for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in parallel with the evolution of therapeutic goals and the refinement of response definitions and monitoring schemes and procedures. Terminology and methodology continue to evolve rapidly, making it difficult for busy hematology/oncology professionals to keep abreast of the newest developments. Optimal CML patient management results from the timely and rational use of molecular testing, the critical assessment of the power and pitfalls of current technology, and the appropriate interpretation and contextualization of results.

In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients who fail imatinib treatment, BCR-ABL1 mutation profiling by Sanger sequencing (SS) is recommended before changing therapy since detection of specific mutations influences second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (2GTKI) choice. We aimed to assess i) in how many patients who relapse on second-line 2GTKI therapy next generation sequencing (NGS) may track resistant mutations back to the sample collected at the time of imatinib resistance, before 2GTKI start (switchover sample) and ii) whether low level mutations identified by NGS always undergo clonal expansion. To this purpose, we used NGS to retrospectively analyze 60 imatinib-resistant patients (CML, n = 45; Ph+ ALL, n = 15) who had failed second-line 2GTKI therapy and had acquired BCR-ABL1 mutations (Group 1) and 25 imatinib-resistant patients (CML, n = 21; Ph+ ALL, n = 4) who had responded to second-line 2GTKI therapy, for comparison (Group 2). NGS uncovered that in 26 (43%) patients in Group 1, the 2GTKI-resistant mutations that triggered relapse were already detectable at low levels in the switchover sample (median mutation burden, 5%; range 1.1%–18.4%). Importantly, none of the low level mutations detected by NGS in switchover samples failed to expand whenever the patient received the 2GTKI to whom they were insensitive. In contrast, no low level mutation that was resistant to the 2GTKI the patients subsequently received was detected in the switchover samples from Group 2. NGS at the time of imatinib failure reliably identifies clinically relevant mutations, thus enabling a more effective therapeutic tailoring.