An optimal platelet-count threshold for prophylactic platelet transfusion in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients has yet to be determined. Between July 1997 and December 1999, we performed the first prospective randomized clinical trial addressing this issue in 159 HSCT recipients who received a prophylactic platelet transfusion when the morning platelet count fell below a 10,000/microL (10K) or 20,000/microL (20K) threshold. Subsequent prophylactic transfusions were administered according to a predetermined algorithm. The number of prophylactic and therapeutic transfusions and the incidence of minor and major bleeding were compared between the 2 groups. The groups were matched according to patient and transplantation characteristics. There were no significant differences in bleeding incidence or severity. Fourteen percent of patients in the 10K arm compared to 17% in the 20K arm had major bleeding events. Only 3 central nervous system bleeds occurred, 2 in the 10K group and 1 in the 20K group. No deaths were attributed to bleeding. An average of 11.4 days of bleeding occurred in both groups. An average of 10.4 platelet transfusions per patient were administered in the 10K group compared to 10.2 in the 20K group (P = .94). More transfusions were given above the assigned transfusion threshold in the 10K group than in the 20K group (4.3/patient versus 1.9/patient, respectively, P = .05). Safety measures incorporated into our study may have precluded demonstration of significant differences in platelet use between the groups. In conclusion, a platelet transfusion trigger of 10K was found to be safe; however, a decrease in platelet use was not achieved because of safety measures incorporated into our study design.

Monitoring intravenous UFH infusions with the anti-Xa HA, compared to the aPTT, achieves therapeutic anticoagulation more rapidly, maintains the values within the goal range for a longer time, and requires fewer adjustments in dosage and repeated tests.

Little is known about patterns of hydroxyurea (HU) use by community-based hematologist/oncologists (H/Os) for the treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD). Determination of these practice patterns pertaining to adult SCD patients was the focus of this study. A self-administered survey was mailed to H/Os in two southeastern states. Replies were received from 70% of eligible physicians. This study focuses on responses from 184 community H/Os and a comparison group of 30 university-based/affiliated H/Os providing ongoing care for at least 3 SCD patients/month. The majority of community H/O respondents saw less than 3 SCD patients/month. HU was prescribed by more than half (55%) of community H/Os in at least 10% of their patients. The most common reasons cited for prescribing HU include frequent painful crises (76%), chronic pain with frequent narcotic use (58%), and acute chest syndrome (43%). Although the majority of community H/Os care for few patients with SCD, the reported indications for HU were consistent with currently accepted recommendations. However, community H/Os reported acute chest syndrome, stroke, and pulmonary hypertension as indications for HU less often than the academic H/O group. Barriers to wider use of HU include physician concerns about carcinogenic potential, doubts about HU effectiveness, perceived patient apprehension about adverse effects, concern about lack of contraceptive use, and patient compliance. Further resources should focus on updating physicians on recently published material supporting the effectiveness of HU in symptomatic SCD as well as providing management guidelines to optimize the use of HU. Am.

No abstract