This is the first study to correlate histological results and complications following TCB and SLB in ILD subjects, some of whom underwent both procedures. TCB is a suitable diagnostic tool in ILD, potentially completely dispensing with the need for an SLB in some cases. In all cases, an interdisciplinary case evaluation is necessary as a final step.

No abstract

Randerath WJ; Treml M; Priegnitz C; Stieglitz S; Hagmeyer L; Morgenstern C. Evaluation of a noninvasive algorithm for differentiation of obstructive and central hypopneas. SLEEP 2013;36(3):363-368.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and associated with poor outcome. At least 50% of heart failure (HF) patients present with SDB, equally divided in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA). CVD patients with SDB do not always present with typical SDB symptoms. Therefore, we asked whether established questionnaires allow for the reliable detection of SDB. In this prospective cohort study, 89 CVD patients (54 male, 59 ± 15 years, BMI 30 ± 6 kg/m) in stable clinical state underwent an ambulatory polygraphy. SDB was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h. We evaluated the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), STOP-BANG and Berlin questionnaires as well as anthropometric data and comorbidities regarding their ability to predict SDB. The ESS showed no correlation with SDB. The sensitivity of the Berlin Questionnaire to detect SDB was 73%, specificity was 42%. The STOP-BANG questionnaire showed a sensitivity of 97% while specificity was 13%. Coronary heart disease and/or history of myocardial infarction, hyperuricemia and age significantly contributed to a logistic regression model predicting presence of SDB. However, our regression model explains only 36% of the variance regarding the presence or absence of SDB. The approach to find variables, which would allow an early and reliable differentiation between patients with CVD and coexistence or absence of SDB, failed. Thus, as CVD patients show a high SDB prevalence and poor outcome, only a systematic screening based on measures of respiration-related parameters (i.e., respiratory flow, blood oxygen saturation, etc.) allows for a reliable SDB assessment.

New findings on pathophysiology, epidemiology, and outcome have raised concerns on the relevance of the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) in the classification of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity. Recently, a multicomponent grading system, decision integrating symptomatology and comorbidities (Baveno classification), was proposed to characterise OSA and to guide therapeutic decisions. We evaluated if this system reflects the OSA population, if it translates into differences in outcomes, and if the addition of AHI improves the scheme. 14 499 OSA patients from the European Sleep Apnoea Database (ESADA) cohort were analysed. The groups were homogeneously distributed and were found to clearly stratify the population with respect to baseline parameters. Differences in sleepiness and blood pressure between the groups were analysed in a subgroup of patients after 24–36 months of treatment. Group A (minor symptoms and comorbidities) did not demonstrate any effect of treatment on outcome. However, groups B (severe symptoms, minor comorbidities), C (minor symptoms, severe comorbidities) and D (severe symptoms and comorbidities) were associated with improvement in either or both parameters with treatment. The AHI is an essential prerequisite of the diagnosis. However, adding the AHI did not improve the classification. Rather, it was inferior with respect to guiding the treatment decision. Thus, the Baveno classification allows a better stratification of the OSA population and may provide a better guidance for therapeutic decisions in OSA.