ObjectivesTo assess the feasibility and clinical efficacy of local field potentials (LFPs)–based adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) in patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD) during daily activities in an open-label, nonblinded study.MethodsWe monitored neurophysiologic and clinical fluctuations during 2 perioperative experimental sessions lasting for up to 8 hours. On the first day, the patient took his/her daily medication, while on the second, he/she additionally underwent subthalamic nucleus aDBS driven by LFPs beta band power.ResultsThe beta band power correlated in both experimental sessions with the patient's clinical state (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.506, p < 0.001, and r = 0.477, p < 0.001). aDBS after LFP changes was effective (30% improvement without medication [3-way analysis of variance, interaction day × medication p = 0.036; 30.5 ± 3.4 vs 22.2 ± 3.3, p = 0.003]), safe, and well tolerated in patients performing regular daily activities and taking additional dopaminergic medication. aDBS was able to decrease DBS amplitude during motor “on” states compared to “off” states (paired t test p = 0.046), and this automatic adjustment of STN-DBS prevented dyskinesias.ConclusionsThe main findings of our study are that aDBS is technically feasible in everyday life and provides a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment method for the management of clinical fluctuations.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with advanced PD, aDBS is safe, well tolerated, and effective in controlling PD motor symptoms.

This study compares the effects on motor symptoms between conventional deep brain stimulation (cDBS) and closed-loop adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) in patients with Parkinson’s Disease. The aDBS stimulation is controlled by the power in the beta band (12–35 Hz) of local field potentials recorded directly by subthalamic nucleus electrodes. Eight subjects were assessed in two 8-h stimulation sessions (first day, cDBS; second day, aDBS) with regular levodopa intake and during normal daily activities. The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III scores, the Rush scale for dyskinesias, and the total electrical energy delivered to the tissues per second (TEEDs) were significantly lower in the aDBS session (relative UPDRS mean, cDBS: 0.46 ± 0.05, aDBS: 0.33 ± 0.04, p = 0.015; UPDRS part III rigidity subset mean, cDBS: 2.9143 ± 0.6551 and aDBS: 2.1429 ± 0.5010, p = 0.034; UPDRS part III standard deviation cDBS: 2.95, aDBS: 2.68; p = 0.047; Rush scale, cDBS 2.79 ± 0.39 versus aDBS 1.57 ± 0.23, p = 0.037; cDBS TEEDs mean: 28.75 ± 3.36 µj s−1, aDBS TEEDs mean: 16.47 ± 3.33, p = 0.032 Wilcoxon’s sign rank test). This work further supports the safety and effectiveness of aDBS stimulation compared to cDBS in a daily session, both in terms of motor performance and TEED to the patient.

No abstract

Health data autonomously collected by users are presently considered as largely beneficial for wellness, prevention, disease management, as well as clinical research, especially when longitudinal, chronic, home-based monitoring is needed. However, data quality and reliability are the main barriers to overcome, in order to exploit such potential. To this end, we designed, implemented, and tested a system to integrate patient-generated personally collected health data into the clinical research data workflow, using a standards-based architecture that ensures the fulfillment of the major requirements for digital data in clinical studies. The system was tested in a clinical investigation for the optimization of deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease that required both the collection of patient-generated data and of clinical and neurophysiological data. The validation showed that the implemented system was able to provide a reliable solution for including the patient as direct digital data source, ensuring reliability, integrity, security, attributability, and auditability of data. These results suggest that personally collected health data can be used as a reliable data source in longitudinal clinical research, thus improving holistic patient's personal assessment and monitoring.

Background: Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS) is now considered as a new feasible and effective paradigm to deliver DBS to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in such a way that not only stimulation is personalized and finely tuned to the instantaneous patient's state, but also motor improvement is obtained with a lower amount of energy transferred to the tissue. Amplitude-controlled aDBS was shown to significantly decrease the amplitude-driven total electrical energy delivered to the tissue (aTEED), an objective measure of the amount of energy transferred by DBS amplitude to the patient's brain. However, there is no direct evidence of a relationship between aTEED and the occurrence of DBS-related adverse events in humans.Objective: In this work, we investigated the correlation of aTEED with the occurrence of levodopa-induced dyskinesias pooling all the data available from our previous experiments using aDBS and cDBS.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data coming from 19 patients with PD undergoing surgery for STN-DBS electrode positioning and participating to experiments involving cDBS and aDBS delivery. Patients were all studied some days after the surgery (acute setting). The aTEED and dyskinesia assessments (Rush Dyskinesia Rating Scale, RDRS) considered in the Med ON-Stim ON condition.Results: We confirmed both that aTEED values and RDRS were significantly lower in the aDBS than in cDBS sessions (aTEED mean value, cDBS: 0.0278 ± 0.0011 j, vs. aDBS: 0.0071 ± 0.0003 j, p &lt; 0.0001 Wilcoxon's rank sum; normalized RDRS mean score, cDBS: 0.66 ± 0.017 vs. aDBS: 0.45 ± 0.01, p = 0.025, Wilcoxon's rank sum test). In addition, we found a direct significant correlation between aTEED and RDRS (ρ = 0.44, p = 0.0032, Spearman's correlation).Conclusions: Our results provide a first piece of evidence that aTEED is correlated to the amount of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in patients with PD undergoing STN-DBS, thus supporting the role of aDBS as feasible and safe alternative to cDBS.