Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) represents the main restraint against lateral patellar displacement. The MPFL insertion at the patella is up to 30 mm wide and is located along the upper half of the medial patellar rim. The femoral insertion of the MPFL is approximately 10 mm distal to the apex of the adductor tubercle and 16 mm proximal to the medial epicondyle. Since most of the patients suffer from MPFL rupture just after the first patellar dislocation, MPFL reconstruction results necessarily in all cases of chronic objective patellar instability to reestablish the primary passive patellofemoral stabilizer. Over time, different techniques of MPFL reconstruction have been proposed with promising results in terms of patient satisfaction and redislocation rate. However, each of these techniques may present peculiar problems and/or complications. An anatomic double-bundle MPFL reconstruction through an aperture fixation both at the femur and at the patella is here presented. The anatomic double-bundle MPFL reconstruction could allow recreating the fan-shape and biomechanics of original MPFL, whereas aperture fixation could provide a strong and safe fixation without risk of loosening or slackening of the graft.
BACKGROUND The osteoarthritis of the ankle, although less common than other joints, is associated with severe functional limitation. Surgical options are ankle arthroscopic debridement, osteotomies, ankle arthrodesis and ankle arthroplasty. Ankle arthroplasty is increasingly used thanks to the new implants design, but ankle arthrodesis still represents the most used technique and it can be performed arthroscopically or with an open procedure. AIM To compare mid-term results of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis of patients affected by end-stage ankle arthritis. METHODS This study enrolled 23 patients, which underwent ankle arthrodesis. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (open procedure; n = 11) and group B (arthroscopic procedure, n = 12), the two groups were homogeneous with regard to age and body mass index ( P = 0.347). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle score (AOFAS), Freiburg Ankle score (FAS) and visual analogue scale for pain intensity were evaluated preoperatively, at six months and at final follow-up of 7.6 years in group A and 7.3 years in group B ( P = 0.364). RESULTS Patients in the arthroscopic group showed better results at six-month follow-up compared to the open group at the AOFAS (group A, 62.2; group B, 78.5; P < 0.05) and the FAS (group A, 61.1; group B, 70.3; P = 0.015) scores. Pain relief was achieved in both groups at six-month follow-up (group A, 1.4; group B, 0.9; P = 0.162). Both open and arthroscopic groups showed improved clinical outcomes from baseline to final follow-up ( P > 0.05). Hospital stay was shorter in group B than in group A ( P = 0.001). More complications were reported in the open group than in the arthroscopic group ( P = 0.459). CONCLUSION The arthroscopic and the open arthrodesis are valid and safe options for the treatment of ankle arthritis on the basis of clinical outcomes at 7 years follow-up. Moreover, the arthroscopic treatment shows faster improvement at six-month follow-up in comparison with the open group.
Backgrounds Chronic osteomyelitis is a major challenge in orthopaedic surgery; it is the result of open fracture, periprosthetic infection and septic arthritis. Osteomyelitis leads to fracture nonunion. The treatment of bone infection and infected nonunion consists primarily of the complete removal of infected and avascular bone and soft tissue from the surgical site, followed by local and systemic pathogen-specific antibiotic therapy and temporary stabilisation, but may lead to massive skeletal and soft tissue defects. The use of free or pedicled vascularised bone transfers and callus distraction techniques (bone transport) has been recommended for large bone defects. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of patients affected by infected non-unions of the lower limbs, treated with a corticoperiosteal flap from the medial femoral condyle and to investigate the donor site morbidity of this flap. Materials and methods The patients were 11 males (average age of 45.6 years), who presented a nonunion of the tibial diaphysis in 7 cases and non-union of femoral diaphysis in 4 cases, treated with free or pedicled corticoperiosteal flap. In all patients, surgical debridement was performed before the flap of infected bone and soft tissues that would not contribute to wound healing. Clinical and radiographic evaluations of the recipient site were performed. Preoperative and postoperative X-ray and MRI scans after the 3-year follow-up of the donor site were performed, in order to observe possible bone restoration and any complications. Results The patients reported complete clinical and radiographic bone healing in 90.9 % of cases. As regards donor site, there were no differences between the medial femoral donor condyle compared to the contralateral site, due to complete regeneration of donor site bone. MRI investigation showed complete restoration of the donor site with vascularised bone in all patients. Conclusions Our results suggest that the use of bone flaps for the treatment of infected non-unions is an effective procedure, that must be performed after accurate debridement of the non-union site. The corticoperiosteal flap seems to have few morbidities on the donor site and a high percentage of successful bone healing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.