POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME (PCOS) is a common endocrine and metabolic disorder present in 5-15% of women of reproductive age depending on the diagnostic criteria used [1,2]. The common features of PCOS are hyperandrogenism, irregular menstruation and polycystic ovaries by ultrasonography [3,4]. In addition, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism and obesity might play important roles in the pathophysiologic process of PCOS, and the interaction of these factors might result in an increased risk of not only type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease [5][6][7] Abstract. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder characterized by insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism. The interaction of these factors might result in increased risks of miscarriage and pregnancy complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). To examine the pregnancy risks in women with PCOS, we compared obstetrical outcomes between patients with and without PCOS. We also studied the differences in maternal characteristics, glucose intolerance and pregnancy complications between PCOS patients with and without GDM, with and without obesity, and between successful pregnancies and miscarriages. We observed a high incidence of GDM and prevalence of GDM diagnosis in the first trimester in PCOS. Patients with GDM had higher body mass index (BMI) and lower homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) at preconception than those without GDM. Obese pregnant women with PCOS demonstrated a high incidence of GDM with severe insulin resistance, including high fasting insulin, HOMA of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and HOMA-β at preconception compared with normal-weight patients. BMI was significantly correlated with HOMA-IR or HOMA-β, and both indices were lower in PCOS patients with than without GDM for the same BMI. There were no significant differences in maternal characteristics (excluding maternal age) between PCOS patients with successful pregnancy and PCOS patients with miscarriages. Our data suggest that pregnant women with PCOS have an increased risk of GDM, especially if they have obesity and/or poorer insulin secretion. Measure of β-cell function, such as HOMA-β, at preconception might be a useful predictor of the risk of GDM in pregnant PCOS patients.Key words: Polycystic ovary syndrome, Insulin resistance, Pregnancy complication, Gestational diabetes mellitus gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [8].Because insulin resistance and obesity might affect the course of pregnancy in women with PCOS, we compared the obstetrical outcomes between the patients with PCOS and without PCOS. We also examined the differences in maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes between PCOS patients with and without GDM and with and without obesity. Furthermore, we examined the differences in maternal characteristics between successful pregnancies and miscarriages to determine the risks of pregnancy loss in women with PCOS. Materials and MethodsA total of 64 Japanese pregnant women with PCOS (includ...

Aim: The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer retrospectively in the wake of the laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer (LACC) trial. Methods: A total of 109 patients with stage IA1 with lymphovascular space involvement, IA2, and IB1 cervical cancers were included in this study. The surgical and oncological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent type C MIRH with a no-touch isolation technique for cervical tumor. Results: The median number of resected pelvic lymph nodes was 36 (range, 14-94), and 10 patients (9.2%) had positive nodes. One patient (0.9%) had positive surgical margins. Forty-six patients (42%) underwent adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 73 months (range, 30-146 months). Five patients (4.6%) developed recurrent disease, and 3 patients (2.8%) died of cervical cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 96.3% and 97.2%, respectively. A comparison between patients with tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm (n = 59) and those with tumor diameter > 2 cm (n = 50) did not identify any significant differences, with 5-year disease-free survival 96.6% versus 94.0% and 5-year overall survival 98.3% versus 96.0%, respectively. Conclusion: In this retrospective study, MIRH with a no-touch isolation technique for stage IA to IB1 cervical cancer was a safe approach in terms of oncological outcomes. However, every surgeon who treats early-stage cervical cancer should inform each patient of the results of the LACC trial because it has an exceedingly high impact.

Metastasis from various neoplasms to the spleen is very rare and most of the cases are found at autopsy. We report a patient presenting with uterine cervical cancer with splenic metastases. A 49-year-old woman presenting with genital bleeding was referred to our hospital and diagnosed with stage IIB cervical cancer. She underwent concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) consisting of 50 Gy whole pelvis irradiation, high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy 24 Gy/4 fractions and six weeks of paclitaxel and carboplatin administration. Ten months after the initial therapy, CT revealed recurrence at spleen. Although she received 5 courses of nedaplatin, enlargement of the tumor was noticed. She underwent a splenectomy and the result of histology was compatible with metastasis of cervical cancer.

Aim: We compared the short-term outcomes between conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) and robotassisted surgery (RAS) to assess the technical feasibility of the latter for early-stage endometrial cancer. Methods: We retrospectively compared the perioperative outcomes between two groups of 223 patients (CLS group, n = 102; RAS group, n = 121) with early-stage endometrial cancer. Surgical procedures included hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. We analyzed the data from intrapelvic surgery alone because para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed via conventional endoscopic extraperitoneal approach without robot for both groups. Results: No differences were identified in patients' age and body mass index. The mean operative time was 133 AE 28 versus 178 AE 41 min (P < 0.01), mean blood loss was 196 AE 153 versus 237 AE 146 mL (P = 0.047), mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 9 AE 4 versus 8 AE 3 days (P = 0.01) and mean rate of perioperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher was 2.0 versus 3.4% (P = 0.53) for the CLS versus RAS groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the number of resected lymph nodes. Conclusion:The operative time was significantly longer and blood loss was significantly greater in the RAS group than in the CLS group, without a significant difference in the number of resected lymph nodes. These differences are within an acceptable clinical range, showing that RAS is feasible and safe for early-stage endometrial cancer, providing short-term outcomes comparable to those of conventional surgery. Future studies are warranted to compare the long-term oncological outcomes by extending the observation period and including para-aortic lymphadenectomy data.