Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) assessed by ultrasonography is regarded as an early predictor of general arteriosclerosis in patients with essential hypertension. However, the methods of measuring IMT have not been globally standardized, and it remains unclear whether conventional measurement of IMT represents the prevalence of hypertensive target organ damage. In this study, we verified the association between several commonly used carotid ultrasonographical parameters and the severity of hypertensive target organ damage (retinal arteriosclerosis, microalbuminuria, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)). Carotid ultrasonography, echocardiography, urinalysis, and funduscopy were performed in 184 patients (64 7 12 years, 96 males and 88 females) with various stages of essential hypertension. Carotid arteriosclerosis was assessed using four methodologically different methods: conventional-IMT, maximum-IMT (Max-IMT), Mean-IMT, and Plaque Score (the sum of all plaque thicknesses). Age and all carotid ultrasonographical parameters were significantly associated with albuminuria, retinal arteriosclerosis, and left ventricular mass index. High-sensitivity CRP was significantly correlated with retinopathy and LVH. Carotid parameters in patients with histories of cardiovascular events were significantly greater in those without events. Among all carotid parameters, Max-IMT showed the highest correlation coefficient of the severity of target organ damage, and showed significant association with CRP. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that Max-IMT was the independent factor for predicting target organ damage. Max-IMT is suggested to be the most reliable and simplest parameter for predicting hypertensive target organ damage including microangiopathy in patients with essential hypertension.
Our findings indicate that masked hypertension is associated with advanced target organ damage in treated hypertensive patients, comparable to that in cases of sustained hypertension.
Recent studies have shown that the converse phenomenon of white-coat hypertension called 'reverse white-coat hypertension' or 'masked hypertension' is associated with poor cardiovascular prognosis. We assessed the hypothesis that this phenomenon may specifically influence left ventricular (LV) structure in treated hypertensive patients. A total of 272 outpatients (mean age, 65 years) with chronically treated essential hypertension and without remarkable white-coat effect were enrolled. Patients were classified into two groups according to office and daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP); that is subjects without (Group 1: office SBP Xdaytime SBP, n ¼ 149) and with reverse white-coat effect (Group 2: office SBPodaytime SBP, n ¼ 123). LV mass index and relative wall thickness were echocardiographically determined. In all subjects, LV mass index and relative wall thickness were positively correlated with daytime and 24-h SBP, but not with office SBP. In addition, these two indices were inversely correlated with office -daytime SBP difference. LV mass index (136731 and 115728 g/m 2 , mean7s.d.) and relative wall thickness (0.4970.09 and 0.4670.07) were significantly greater in Group 2 than in Group 1. As for LV geometric patterns, Group 2 had a significantly higher rate of concentric hypertrophy compared with Group 1 (48 and 28%). Multivariate analyses revealed that the presence of reverse white-coat effect was a predictor for LV concentric hypertrophy, independent of age, sex, hypertension duration, antihypertensive treatment and ambulatory blood pressure levels. Our findings demonstrate that reverse white-coat effect is an independent risk factor for LV hypertrophy, especially concentric hypertrophy, in treated hypertensive patients.
These findings suggest that the presence of reverse white-coat effect may be an independent risk for early renal damage in treated hypertensive patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.