A multicentre case series of patients with chronic migraine (CM) treated with monoclonal antibodies directed against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP-mAbs) switching were developed. The effectiveness and safety of CGRP-mAbs switching as a preventive treatment for CM in clinical practice were recorded. Effectiveness was measured by ≥50% reduction of monthly migraine days in respect to baseline and reduction in pain intensity. Safety was analysed through adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuations. Seven patients were included. The reason for switching was non-response in all cases. Two patients presented a response to the first CGRP-mAb, but the effect was lost after 3 months. The remaining five patients were non-responders. Response to the second CGRP-mAb was observed in three patients, one of them for >3 months. Less than half of the patients previously treated with a CGRP-mAb responded to switching with a second CGRP-mAb. AEs were rare, with no treatment discontinuations.

Objective Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations have a poor prognosis and few therapeutic alternatives. We conducted a review of scientific evidence about therapies in NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations. Data Sources A systematic review in PubMed® database was performed up to November 19, 2022. Clinical trials (CTs) about treatments of patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic NSCLC harbouring EGFR exon 20 insertions who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy were selected. CTs with a sample size of less than 10 patients were discarded. Efficacy results were used to determine the most interesting drugs. Subsequently, a more exhaustive analysis of the design of the CTs and safety of the most interesting schemes was conducted. Comparisons were attempted to develop. Data Summary A total of 40 records were found in the systematic search. Twelve selected CTs included the following therapies: poziotinib, osimertinib, pertuzumab–trastuzumab–docetaxel scheme, mobocertinib, amivantamab, erlotinib–onalespib regimen, luminespib, ado-trastuzumab emtansine and dacomitinib. Mobocertinib, amivantamab and poziotinib were determined as the most interesting treatments according to efficacy data. Gastrointestinal and dermatological adverse reactions were relevant in these regimens. All CTs presented a non-randomised design. No reliable comparisons could be developed. Conclusions The efficacy of mobocertinib, amivantamab and poziotinib in NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations is promising. However, therapies were assessed in single-arm CTs with low-quality evidence. Comparative studies with more extensive patient follow-up, larger sample size and better design are needed to reliably quantify the effect of these drugs.

No abstract

Belantamab mafodotin (BLMF) is an interesting therapeutic alternative for multiple myeloma (MM) patients pretreated with immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. Scientific evidence on BLMF provides immature data about progression-free survival and overall survival by short follow-up of patients with poor prognoses. Cases with long follow-ups could provide additional information about BLMF. This case reports a patient with MM treated with BLMF who had received nine previous lines of therapy with a follow-up of 11 months. No complete response was obtained. However, no disease progression was observed and the patient was still alive at the end of this work. BLMF showed manageable adverse effects. Our patient presented advanced disease, good functional status at the beginning of BLMF treatment, and elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase during BLMF therapy. The influence of these last two factors was not evaluated in clinical trials. This relationship should be assessed more deeply in future studies.

Objective: Refractory multiple myeloma (MM) presents poor responses to therapies. New drugs for highly pretreated MM are a hope for this clinical context with limited treatment options. We developed a comparative commentary on the evidence about the use of belantamab mafodotin in heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory MM with respect to other therapies. Data sources: Regimen data were extracted from pivotal clinical trials. Data summary: Response rates were the main efficacy outcomes reported in trials. Overall response was achieved by approximately 30% of patients trated with belantamab mafodotin. Response rates of different regimens must be supported by more relevant data, such as overall survival or progression-free survival. Subgroups of patients with extramedullary disease and revised International Staging System III should be thoroughly evaluated in phase III comparative clinical trials with larger sample sizes. Belantamab mafodotin presented specific adverse events (visual disturbances and kerathopathies). Grade 3–4 adverse events involved high percentages of patients treated with the different schemes. The budgetary impact of different treatments for heavily pretreated refractory MM would be very high. Literature suggested increased efficiency of belantamab mafodotin versus chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Conclusions: Belantamab mafodotin and other regimens are promising drugs for MM, especially for triple-class refractory patients. Comparative studies are necessary to perform a reliable therapeutic positioning.