<p>En 1912 el presidente Roque Sáenz Peña inauguró con la reforma de la legislación electoral un clima general de democratización y de modernización de la política argentina. Este estudio aborda las tensiones y los conflictos al interior del Partido Conservador de la provincia de Buenos Aires engendrados por las iniciativas reformistas que respondieron a la atmósfera imperante en el plano nacional. La conflictividad se desató en torno de dos cuestiones centrales: la adecuación de la legislación electoral provincial a los imperativos de la ley Sáenz Peña y la democratización de la organización y del funcionamiento interno del propio Partido Conservador. El presente trabajo se ocupa de esta etapa clave en la historia política de la provincia y de su principal agrupación.</p><p> </p>
In this article, we propose an initial comparative approach to the cultural and political impact of the First World War on Spain and Argentina, considering the common denominators and the singularities of both social experiences of the conflict. The relevance of the proposed comparison lies in several factors. In the first place, deep historical, cultural and demographic ties bound both nations. In second place, during the First World War, Spain and Argentina adopted a neutralist foreign policy, unaltered despite several diplomatic incidents with the warring nations, and of internal and external pressures. In both cases, civil society displayed a high level of political and cultural polarisation, and undertook an active mobilisation. Finally, there was a remarkable circulation of ideas and intellectuals through both margins of the Atlantic Ocean, which nourished the public controversies on the Great War. Nevertheless, beyond these similarities and confluences, there were also significant differences between Argentina and Spain, which exerted an influence on the countries position towards the conflict. The national cases analysed in this article demonstrate that diplomatic neutrality did not imply necessarily the indifference or passivity of civil society. Rediscovering neutrality within the war dynamics is one of the most stimulating paths for research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.