Objective. To determine if supervised cardiovascular training improves exercise tolerance, aerobic capacity, depression, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. Sixty women with SLE (ages 18 -55 years) were evaluated using Short Form 36, visual analog scale for pain, scale for fatigue, Beck Depression Inventory, and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and participated in a training protocol of incremental load on a treadmill with computed gas metabolic analysis. Maximum oxygen consumption (VO 2max ) and anaerobic threshold VO 2 were calculated with a SensorMedics Vmax29C analyzer (Sensor Medics, Yorba Linda, CA), and heart rate was measured by electrocardiogram. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a training group (41 patients) that participated in the supervised cardiovascular training program and a control group ( 19 patients) that did not participate in the program. All variables were analyzed at baseline and after 12 weeks for both groups. The training program occurred in the morning for 60 minutes, 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon's rank sum test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test. P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results. The 2 groups were homogeneous and comparable at baseline. The training group showed a significant improvement of aerobic capacity measured by anaerobic threshold VO 2 (14.67 ؎ 3.03 versus 17.08 ؎ 3.35 ml/kg/minute, P < 0.001).Comparison of the training group and control group after 12 weeks showed a significant difference relating to VO 2max (24.31 ؎ 4.61 versus 21.21 ؎ 3.88 ml/kg/minute, P ؍ 0.01) and anaerobic threshold VO 2 (17.08 ؎ 3.35 versus 13.66 ؎ 2.82 ml/kg/minute, P < 0.0001). After cardiovascular training, we found a significant improvement of Beck inventory score (8.37 ؎ 12.79 versus 2.90 ؎ 3.00, P < 0.001) and HAQ score (0.14 ؎ 0.21 versus 0.06 ؎ 0.19, P < 0.01) in the training group. Conclusion. This study showed significant improvement in exercise tolerance, aerobic capacity, quality of life, and depression after a supervised cardiovascular training program in patients with SLE.
Osteonecrosis is a relatively common complication in systemiclupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Objective: To evaluate the possible risk factors associated with osteonecrosis in SLE patients. Methods: SLE patients [according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria] who presented osteonecrosis were included in this study. SLE patients with no symptomatic osteonecrosis constituted the control group. Osteonecrosis was confirmed by radiographic evaluation, bone scintigraphy and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Results: The study group was constituted by 14 SLE patients with osteonecrosis (10 women and 4 men, 64% of them white, 33±13 years old and 120±67 months of disease duration). Sex and time of SLE diagnosis matched patients without osteonecrosis constituted the control group (n=14, 57% of them white, 33±7 years old and 111±54 months of SLE). Systemic lupus international collaborating clinics/ACR damage index for SLE (SLICC/ACR-DI) score was higher in patients with osteonecrosis (4±1) compared with control group (1±1) [p<0.001]. Patients with osteonecrosis had higher number of other musculoskeletal irreversible damage when compared with the control group (29% versus 0, respectively; p=0.034). Digital vasculitis was the variable associated with osteonecrosis (p=0.021). There was no significant association between duration of prednisone use or prednisone cumulative dose and osteonecrosis in patients with regular follow-up at the Institution (p=0.624 and p = 0.806, respectively). Conclusions: Previous history of digital vasculitis was a risk factor for the development of osteonecrosis. Patients with digital vasculitis history had 9 times more risk to present osteonecrosis than patients without previous vasculitis
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.