COVID-19 vaccines are safe at a very high rate and protect against severe disease, hospitalization, and mortality. Schools are workplaces with high transmissibility of coronavirus and teachers are at risk of infection. The study aimed to find out the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in teachers. An on-line cross-sectional survey with a convenience sample was conducted, in Greece, during December 2021. We collected demographic data of teachers and we measured their attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination and the pandemic. The sample included 513 teachers. The majority of them was vaccinated against COVID-19 (85.8%). The most important reasons for teachers’ decline in COVID-19 vaccination were their concerns about safety, effectiveness and the side effects of COVID-19 vaccine. Also, furthermore they were characterized by strong self-assessment that they will not be infected by the COVID-19, and self-assessment that the COVID-19 vaccination will be useless for those who have already been diagnosed with COVID-19. After multivariable analysis, we found that increased age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02–1.14, p = 0.011), and trust in COVID-19 vaccination (OR 2.57, 95% CI 2.07–3.18, p < 0.001) were related with an increased probability of a COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Also, teachers who lived with elderly people or vulnerable groups (OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.55–14.89, p = 0.006) during the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrated greater probability to take COVID-19 vaccine. The study highlighted the need for reliable and accurate public information on both the risks of coronavirus infection and the vaccines’ safety and efficacy.

Introduction: The working environment in special education school units may lead to personnel burnout syndrome for the various professionals working in such field. Objective: To investigate the extent of burnout syndrome among special education school units’ personnel and the factors affecting its manifestation. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted, with a convenience sample of 346 people, working at special education school units. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory was used for data collection. Results: Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency value was 0.85 regarding personal burnout, 0.73 regarding professional burnout, and 0.83 regarding burnout related to students. As for the participants, 45% were teachers, 23.7% school nurses, 12.9% speech therapists and 18.4% other professionals. The average on all three subscales of the inventory was <50, which shows a low level of burnout. According to the results of the multivariate linear regression, permanent (coefficient b=8.0, 95% CI=3.2-12.9, p=0.001) and contract staff (coefficient b=15.4, 95% CI=8.4-22.4, p<0.001) presented higher levels of personal burnout, in comparison to substitute personnel. Permanent staff (coefficient b=8.9, 95% CI=3.9-13.9, p=0.001) and contract staff (coefficient b=10.0, 95% CI 95=2.9-17.2, p=0.006) presented higher levels of professional burnout, in comparison to substitute staff. Finally, the higher the work experience in the specialty, the higher the level of burnout related to students (coefficient b=0.4, 95% CI=0.01-0.7, p=0.042). Conclusions: The special education school units’ personnel go presented low levels of burnout. It is proposed that more studies would be conducted in the future, where, apart from the demographic characteristics of the participants, other factors that contribute to personnels’ burnout syndrome would be examined, such as work environment characteristics.