We recently reported the results of an External Quality Assessment Study (EQA) on HCV RNA plasma pool testing addressed to manufacturers of blood products [1]. The study, carried out in two independent stages during the year 2000, demonstrated an excellent performance of participating laboratories. In fact, using validated nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT), manufacturers of blood products proved to fully comply with the relevant European guideline [2] by showing consistency with their stated detection limit.In order to continue providing laboratories involved in plasma pool testing for HCV RNA by NAT with an external quality measure of their proficiency, we organized a new EQA study for the year 2001. All laboratories, which took part in the previous study, participated in this EQA. In addition, two more manufacturers, one from Argentina and one from Switzerland, and three blood transfusion centres, one from Germany and two from Italy, were accepted as participants. This time the aim of the study was to confirm that participants comply with the European Pharmacopoeia requirement regarding the 100-IU/ml detection level and to verify the absence of cross contamination [3]. Consequently, the panel consisted of the following 20 coded samples: eight negative replicates, 10 replicates containing 100 IU/ml and two replicates containing 17 000 IU/ml. Two Italian reference preparations calibrated against the first WHO HCV RNA International Standard [4], ISS 0498 and ISS 0198, containing 1700 and 17 000 IU/ml, respectively, were used to prepare the positive samples. The former, recently characterized in an international collaborative study [5], was diluted to obtain the 100-IU/ml samples while the latter was used undiluted to prepare the high-titre samples. Before shipping it, the panel was tested in our laboratory by two operators in order to confirm the HCV positivity/negativity of the samples. Participants, who were assigned a random code, were asked to test the panel by their routine procedure. Seven out of the 15 participating laboratories used an in-house method while the rest used a commercial kit. As the samples were scheduled for shipment after 11 September 2001, serious problems with flight connections occurred in the aftermath of the terrorists' attack in the USA. As a consequence, two laboratories received the panel thawed and only in one case was it possible to send a new panel. The deadline for sending the results was postponed from the end of November to mid-December 2001.All 15 participants sent their results including the laboratory that received the panel thawed but decided to test it anyway. As in this case degradation of HCV RNA during the long uncontrolled storage period could not be excluded, we did not evaluate the results of this laboratory. Still, we informed the laboratory of its results as these could be of some use for the participant. With respect to the other laboratories, all samples with a nominal concentration of 100 IU/ml and 17 000 IU/ml tested positive in 100% of the assays. De...