Data about processes and outcomes of preschool teacher education is scarce. This paper examines the opportunities to learn (OTL) of prospective preschool teachers (N = 1,851) at different types and stages of preschool teacher education and their relation to general pedagogical knowledge (GPK), mathematics pedagogical content knowledge (MPCK), and mathematical content knowledge (MCK) with standardized tests. Process indicators in terms of OTL and outcome indicators in terms of knowledge varied substantially across teacher education types and stages. Controlling for preschool teachers’ background, multilevel models revealed that OTL in general pedagogy and mathematics pedagogy provided during teacher education were significantly related to GPK and MPCK. Effect sizes reached up to 2 thirds of a standard deviation. OTL in mathematics pedagogy were in turn significantly related to the type of institution that offered a program in favor of pedagogical colleges compared with vocational schools. OTL were also significantly related to program stage in favor of the last year of preschool teacher education compared with the beginning. Process characteristics in terms of OTL mediated fully or partly structural characteristics of teacher education such as type of institution or program stage. These results suggest that the OTL provided are more important than whether prospective preschool teachers were at the beginning or the end of their program or whether they were prepared at vocational schools or pedagogical colleges (although entrance differences have still be taken into account). It may be an important responsibility of policymakers then to ensure that all prospective preschool teachers receive sufficient OTL.
Zusammenfassung. Im Unterschied zur Lehrerforschung ist über das professionelle Wissen frühpädagogischer Fachkräfte kaum etwas bekannt. Der Beitrag stellt eine Testbatterie vor, die auf die Diagnose unterschiedlicher Ausprägungen des pädagogischen, mathematikdidaktischen und mathematischen Wissens angehender Frühpädagogen auf Gruppenebene ausgerichtet ist. In Mehrebenen-Mehrgruppen-Analysen basierend auf einer Vier-Kohorten-Stichprobe (N = 1851) weisen die Tests konfigurale und metrische sowie annäherungsweise skalare Messinvarianz über die Kohorten, das Geschlecht und die sprachliche Herkunft auf. Die aus der Lehrerforschung übernommene dreidimensionale Wissensstruktur konnte repliziert werden (faktorielle Validität), allerdings weist eine sparsamere zweidimensionale Modellierung eine ebensogute Passung auf. Vorhergesagte Zusammenhänge zwischen Testscores und Mathematik- bzw. Deutschnoten indizieren konvergente und diskriminante Validität. Die Tests sind sensitiv, indem sie vorhergesagte Unterschiede zwischen Fachschülern und Fachhochschülern sowie Ausbildungsbeginn und -ende abbilden. Fachschüler lösen selten Items, die basale Fachsprachlichkeit oder Bezüge auf Theorien erfordern.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.