Paromomycin binds specifically to a single type of binding site on the 70‐S streptomycin‐sensitive Escherichia coli ribosome. This site is different from that of dihydrostreptomycin since paromomycin binds to streptomycin‐resistant ribosomes and since dihydrostreptomycin does not compete for paromomycin binding. Paromomycin binding, unlike dihydrostreptomycin binding, is independent of changes in ribosome concentration but influenced by magnesium ion concentration. Moreover, paromomycin does not bind to the 30‐S subunit of the streptomycin‐sensitive ribosome, except in the presence of dihydrostreptomycin, which probably induces the conformational changes necessary for a paromomycin binding site. This induction does not occur with streptomycin‐resistant ribosomes. Neither antibiotic binds to the 50‐S subunit. In general, binding of the one antibiotic increases the number of sites available for binding of the other. Both antibiotics hibit marked non‐specific binding at high antibiotic/ribosome ratios. Competition studies have enabled the classification of other aminoglycosides according to their ability to compete for the paromomycin and dihydrostreptomycin binding sites. Derivatives structurally related to paromomycin compete for its binding, the degree of competition being related to antibacterial activity, but do not compete for dihydrostreptomycin binding; they, on the contrary, increase the number of dihydrostreptomycin binding sites. Neither gentamicin nor kanamycin derivatives, which induce a high level of misreading, nor kasugamycin and spectinomycin, which do not induce misreading, compete for paromomycin or dihydrostreptomycin binding sites. Other sites may be involved in the binding of these aminoglycosides and in inducing misreading.

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is formed from its precursor preproET-1 via the cleavage of the intermediate bigET-1 by endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE-1). However, the subcellular site at which this step occurs is not clear: It could occur intravesicularly along the secretory pathway or bigET-1 might be released and processed extracellularly. To address this point, we have developed an integrated autocrine system that uses a recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) luciferase reporter cell line that permanently expresses the human ET(A) receptor. Into these cells we transiently transfected human ECE-1a cDNA, either together with the human preproET-1 cDNA (as an endogenous source of bigET-1), or alone (in which case exogenous bigET-1 was added). Phosphoramidon inhibited the conversion of exogenous bigET-1 (IC50 = 5 to 30 micromol/L) much better than that of endogenous bigET-1 (IC50 > 1 mmol/L). Both conversions showed similar high yields (20% to 100%) that depended on the amount of ECE-1a expressed. Thus, ECE-1a has two equally relevant activities in this recombinant system for CHO cells: (1) an intracellular, probably intravesicular activity, corresponding to the ECE-1a-mediated step of ET-1 biosynthesis and (2) an extracellular activity at the plasma membrane. If this is also the case for endothelial cells, ECE-1a inhibitors would have to cross the plasma and vesicle membranes to be effective. The present system could be useful for screening such inhibitors.

No abstract

No abstract