The aim of this study was to explore the motivations of student nurses enrolled in nursing courses across a variety of Pacific Island countries. The image of nursing, the desire to help others, family and friends in the profession, personal experience, security, travel opportunities and flexibility have all been identified as motivators for people to enter nursing. To date, what motivates students in Pacific Island countries to enrol in a nursing course has not been investigated. An exploratory qualitative approach using focus group interviews with 152 nursing students was undertaken. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis, revealing four themes: (i) helping others; (ii) 'making a difference for my people'; (iii) following in the footsteps of others; and (iv) financial and professional gain. In a time of health and nursing workforce shortages, developing a deeper understanding of what drives people can be used to improve recruitment strategies in the future.
Timor-Leste faces many challenges implementing quality maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) services due to resource constraints and socio-cultural factors that disproportionately affect the health of women and children. A scoping review was conducted to map the quality of MNCH services against WHO quality standards on: 1. Provision of care, 2. Experiences of care, and 3. Cross-cutting standards. The literature search identified 1058 citations, from which 28 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. The findings highlight health workers’ limited capacity to provide quality services and referrals. The major reasons for this are: a lack of essential supplies, poor infrastructure and transport, limited opportunities for ongoing learning, and gaps in health information systems. Provision of care standards and cross-cutting standards require attention at a broad systems level. Findings related to experiences of care highlight the importance of effective communication, respect, and emotional support, particularly for vulnerable women and children who have difficulty accessing services, and for those who have experienced violence. These experience-related standards could be addressed at an individual health worker and health service level, as well as at a systems level. This review provides direction to focus quality-improvement initiatives within local health facilities, as well as at municipal and national level.
Aim: To report the evidence of women's experiences following a diagnosis of gestational breast cancer (GBC) and their interactions with the healthcare system. Design: A systematic scoping review. Data Sources: This scoping review systematically searched Medline, CINAHL, Psych INFO, EMBASE and SCOPUS, in addition to six grey literature databases in October 2021. A 2020 PRISMA flow diagram depicting the flow of information.Review Methods: Guided by six steps in Arksey and OMalley 's Framework (2005).One researcher completed the literature review, and four independently screened the titles and abstracts related to the eligibility criteria.Results: Totalling 25 articles, these studies comprise 2 quantitative, 20 qualitative, 1 mixed-method and 2 other documents, a book and debate. Thematic analysis was guided by Braun and Clarke (2006) to identify an overarching theme of adjustment that underpinned women's narratives and was reinforced by four major and several minor themes. The four major themes were: psychological impact, motherhood, treatment and communication. The relationship between the themes contextualizes the enormous complexity concerning women's experiences with GBC.
Conclusion:Cancer management for GBC is complex and multifaceted. At a time of conflicting emotions for women, Multidisciplinary teams are well placed to provide support, normalize the woman's experience of motherhood, demonstrate an understanding of treatment effects, and communicate in a considerate and empathetic manner with information that is timely and relevant. GBC management involves doctors, nurses, midwives and many other healthcare professionals, which can add to the impost of diagnosis.Impact: This scoping review contributes to a better understanding of women's experience of GBC. The results may inform improvements in the support and communication for these women with GBC and their families.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.