Background The COVID‐19 pandemic has greatly increased the incidence and clinical importance of critical illness myopathy (CIM), because it is one of the most common complications of modern intensive care medicine. Current diagnostic criteria only allow diagnosis of CIM at an advanced stage, so that patients are at risk of being overlooked, especially in early stages. To determine the frequency of CIM and to assess a recently proposed tool for early diagnosis, we have followed a cohort of COVID‐19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and compared the time course of muscle excitability measurements with the definite diagnosis of CIM. Methods Adult COVID‐19 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland requiring mechanical ventilation were recruited and examined on Days 1, 2, 5, and 10 post‐intubation. Clinical examination, muscle excitability measurements, medication record, and laboratory analyses were performed on all study visits, and additionally nerve conduction studies, electromyography and muscle biopsy on Day 10. Muscle excitability data were compared with a cohort of 31 age‐matched healthy subjects. Diagnosis of definite CIM was made according to the current guidelines and was based on patient history, results of clinical and electrophysiological examinations as well as muscle biopsy. Results Complete data were available in 31 out of 44 recruited patients (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [9.8] years). Of these, 17 (55%) developed CIM. Muscle excitability measurements on Day 10 discriminated between patients who developed CIM and those who did not, with a diagnostic precision of 90% (AUC 0.908; 95% CI 0.799–1.000; sensitivity 1.000; specificity 0.714). On Days 1 and 2, muscle excitability parameters also discriminated between the two groups with 73% (AUC 0.734; 95% CI 0.550–0.919; sensitivity 0.562; specificity 0.857) and 82% (AUC 0.820; CI 0.652–0.903; sensitivity 0.750; specificity 0.923) diagnostic precision, respectively. All critically ill COVID‐19 patients showed signs of muscle membrane depolarization compared with healthy subjects, but in patients who developed CIM muscle membrane depolarization on Days 1, 2 and 10 was more pronounced than in patients who did not develop CIM. Conclusions This study reports a 55% prevalence of definite CIM in critically ill COVID‐19 patients. Furthermore, the results confirm that muscle excitability measurements may serve as an alternative method for CIM diagnosis and support its use as a tool for early diagnosis and monitoring the development of CIM.

Among the most challenging diagnostic issues in surgical neuropathology is the distinction between scant infiltration by diffuse gliomas and reactive gliosis. The best documented ancillary marker to establish a definitive diagnosis of glioma in this setting is the identification of hotspot mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/IDH2) genes, which is limited, however, by the low prevalence of these mutations in gliomas of elderly adults. Since telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations are present in the vast majority of IDH-wildtype diffuse gliomas, we hypothesized that combined analysis of IDH and TERT might overcome these limitations. For this purpose, we analyzed a series of non-neoplastic and neoplastic CNS samples for the prevalence of TERT hotspot mutations. TERT mutations were identified in none out of 58 (0%) reactive gliosis samples, and in 91 out of 117 (78%) IDH-wildtype gliomas. Based on a series of 200 consecutive diffuse gliomas, we found that IDH mutation analysis alone had a sensitivity of 28% (63% and 12%, respectively, in patients below and above age of 50) for detection of gliomas, whereas a combined analysis of IDH and TERT was 85% sensitive (87% and 84%, respectively, below and above age of 50). In sum, our findings suggest that TERT promoter mutation analysis contributes favorably to a molecular panel in cases equivocal for glioma versus gliosis on morphological grounds, especially in patients above age of 50, in which IDH analysis alone performs poorly.

BACKGROUND In contrast to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation analysis, which is homogenous within a given tumor, diagnostic errors in histological analysis following the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification could be due to small samples because of histological heterogeneity. OBJECTIVE To assess whether the sample size sent to histopathology influences the tumor grading in IDH wild-type gliomas. METHODS Histologically diagnosed WHO grade, sample volume, and preoperative tumor volume data of 111 patients aged who received resection of IDHwt gliomas between January 2007 and December 2015 at our hospital were evaluated. The differences between absolute and relative pathological sample sizes stratified by WHO grade were conducted using One-Way-Permutation-Test. RESULTS With a mean sample size of 10.9 cc, 83.8% of patients were histologically diagnosed as WHO grade IV, while 16.2% of patients with a mean sample size of 2.62 cc were diagnosed as WHO grade II/III. One-Way-Permutation-Test showed a significant difference between absolute tissue samples stratified by WHO grade (P = .0374). The distribution of preoperative tumor volumes with WHO grade IV vs WHO grade II/III showed no significant difference (P = .8587). Of all tumors with a sample size >10 cc 100% were pathologically diagnosed as WHO grade IV and those with sample size >5 cc 93.5% were diagnosed as WHO grade IV. CONCLUSION Small sample sizes are associated with a higher risk of under-estimating malignancy in histological grading in IDHwt gliomas. This study suggests a standard minimum sample size (>5cc) in every resection. Modalities of adjuvant treatment for IDHwt, WHO grade II/III gliomas need to reflect a prognosis that is only marginally better than of a glioblastoma.