Different devices have been used to enhance topical drug delivery. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different skin pretreatment regimens in topical drug delivery. In six ex vivo human abdominal skin samples, test regions were pretreated with fractional CO 2 and Er:YAG laser (both 70 and 300 μm ablation depth, density of 5%), microneedling (500 μm needle length), fractional radiofrequency (ablation depth of ± 80-90 μm), and no pretreatment. The fluorescent agent indocyanine green (ICG) was applied. After 3 h, fluorescence intensity was measured at several depths using fluorescence photography. Significantly higher surface fluorescence intensities were found for pretreatment with fractional Er:YAG and CO 2 laser and for microneedling vs. no pretreatment (p < 0.05), but not for radiofrequency vs. no pretreatment (p = 0.173). Fluorescence intensity was highest for the Er:YAG laser with 300 μm ablation depth (mean 38.89 arbitrary units; AU), followed by microneedling (33.02 AU) and CO 2 laser with 300 μm ablation depth (26.25 AU). Pretreatment with both lasers with 300 μm ablation depth gave higher fluorescence intensity than with 70 μm ablation depth (Er:YAG laser, 21.65; CO 2 laser, 18.50 AU). Mean fluorescence intensity for radiofrequency was 15.27 AU. Results were comparable at 200 and 400 μm depth in the skin. Pretreatment of the skin with fractional CO 2 laser, fractional Er:YAG laser, and microneedling is effective for topical ICG delivery, while fractional radiofrequency is not. Deeper laser ablation results in improved ICG delivery. These findings may be relevant for the delivery of other drugs with comparable molecular properties.
Fractional laser assisted topical anesthesia is effective even with very low energy settings and an occlusion time of only 15 minutes. Both the CO laser and the Er:YAG laser can be used to assist topical anesthesia although the CO laser pretreatment is experienced as more painful. In our study settings, using articaine/epinephrine solution and an occlusion time of 15 minutes, a density of 15% was more effective than 5%. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:813-818, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Background and Objectives Topical drug delivery can be increased by pretreatment of the skin with ablative fractional laser (AFXL). Several physical penetration enhancement techniques have been investigated to further improve AFXL‐assisted drug delivery. This study investigated the influence of three of these techniques, namely massage, acoustic pressure wave treatment, and pressure vacuum alterations (PVP) on the distribution of the fluorescent drug indocyanine green (ICG) at different depths in the skin after topical application on AFXL pretreated skin. Materials and Methods In ex vivo human skin, test regions were pretreated with AFXL (10,600 nm, channel depth 300 μm, channel width 120 μm, density 15%). Subsequently, ICG was applied, followed by massage, acoustic pressure wave treatment or PVP. ICG fluorescence intensity (FI) was assessed after 1, 3, and 24 hours at several depths using fluorescence photography. Results FI was higher when using enhancement techniques compared to control (AFXL‐only) up to 3 hours application time (P < 0.05). After 3 hours, mean surface FI was highest after acoustic pressure wave treatment (61.5 arbitrary units; AU), followed by massage (57.5AU) and PVP (46.9AU), respectively (for comparison: AFXL‐only 31.6AU, no pretreatment 14.9AU). Comparable or higher FI was achieved already after 1 hour with enhancement techniques compared to 3–24 hours application time without. After 24 hours, no significant differences between enhancement techniques and AFXL‐only were observed (P = 0.31). Conclusion Penetration enhancement techniques, especially acoustic pressure wave treatment and massage, result in improved drug accumulation in AFXL‐pretreated skin and reduce the application time needed. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.